Maharashtra
Kharpud, Satkarwadi, Kude Budruk, Padarwadi, Parsul, Ambhu, Amboli, Avandhe villages
,
Khed and Maval Talukas
,
Pune
Published :
Jul 2024
|
Updated :
Wind Farm located in Western Ghats poses perennial flooding problem for locals
Reported by
Maitreya Prithwiraj Ghorpade
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
5681
People affected
2009
Year started
194
Land area affected
Households affected
5681
People Affected
2009
Year started
194
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

 The 106.4 MW Andhra Lake Wind Farm project, set up at a cost of ₹850 crore, has been a persistent source of flooding problems for the local communities spread across 14 villages of the Khed and Mawal talukas of Pune District, Maharashtra. The Wind Energy project, comprising 133 Wind Turbine Generators (‘WTG’), is situated atop a hilly area within the biodiversity hot-spot of the Western Ghats, covering 194.66 hectares of its reserve forest land.
Diversion of forest land for the project was approved by the MoEFCC on December 10, 2009, and was then promoted by Indo-German enterprise Enercon, in partnership with Wind World India, until it was sold to CLP India, the Indian subsidiary of Chinese Energy Syndicate CLP Group, and Apraava Energy , a power company jointly owned by CLP Group and Canadian investment group CDPQ. The first WTG under this project was commissioned on August 19, 2011, and the project has since been operational with an expected lifetime of 20 years.
However, ever since the project’s inception, activists have protested against governmental grants of permission for the project warning about the potential hazards of situating a project of this size and nature in close proximity to the Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary (‘BWS’). A Pune-based NGO, Kalpavriksh, accordingly wrote a letter to the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Maharashtra in 2011 detailing the various irregularities and illegalities present in the grant of Forest Clearance (‘FC’) to the project.
Speaking with LCW, Pradeep Chavan, member of Kalpavrish, stated that their objections were primarily due to the fact that significant portions of the project area were within a 10-kilometre radius of the ecologically sensitive BWS, which would therefore be in violation of the Wildlife Conservation Strategy 2002, which prohibits Wind Energy projects in such close proximity to Wildlife Sanctuaries. Furthermore, consent from certain affected Gram Sabhas, as required per the Forest Rights Act, 2006, was also not obtained. Chavan further alleged that the FC was granted based on misrepresentation of ground realities by higher authorities in the forest department. However, the project commenced regardless.
The wind farm has been constructed atop a hilly area in the Western Ghats, with an access road covering 3541 hectares constructed leading upto the wind farm. This access road has led to perennial flooding problems for the local farmers in adjoining villages whose rice-fields are often inundated with rainwater and debris flowing from the hill-top down the access road. Kharpud village, around 3.5 kilometre from the boundary of BWS, having routinely witnessed flooding of their rice-fields, protested against the wind farm’s agricultural impact in December 2022, demanding compensation for their loss of produce and damage to fields. Speaking to LCW, Sarpanch of Kharpud village Shri Tanaji Bhopte stated that compensation was infrequently provided to the farmers, but the flooding has become a routine and persistent issue for the local rice-farmers. Bhopte claimed that the noise from the WTGs is adversely impacting the local wildlife, and complained of a lack of employment opportunities given to the local communities by the wind farm, despite promises of such being made during the project’s initial stages. “They should at least supply our villages with electricity, power cuts are still often felt for 6-8 hours a day” he added.
Despite these facts, the project was registered under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Clean Development Mechanism (UNFCCC CDM) project, with effect from August 10, 2012, and has since been ‘monitored’ by the UNFCCC.
A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by one Mr. Dattatray Kale against the project, which led to a  stay against the project being issued by the Bombay High Court on the 16th of December, 2010. However, the PIL was ultimately disposed off in 2014 by Bombay High Court vide order dated 9th September 2014, wherein the Court observed that the matter was being disposed off due to death of the Applicant, but “the issues raised (were) kept open”.  No further litigation against the project has thus far taken place. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2031

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

850

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2019

Page Number In Investment Document:

49

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

September 2014

Why did the conflict end?

Bombay High Court disposed off a PIL filed against the project. No further litigation was undertaken and the local communities were forced into acquiescence.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department, Maharashtra

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Enercon GmbH; Wind World India; CLP India Pvt. Ltd.; CPDQ; Apaarva Energy

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Maitreya Prithwiraj Ghorpade

Maitreya is an independent environmental law practitioner having secured a B.A.LL.B. (Hons) from Hidayatullah National Law University.

Initiating his legal practice at the chambers of ex-President of the NGT Western Zone Bar Association Adv. Asim Sarode, Maitreya has gone on to work with the 2021 Right Livelihood awardee 'Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment' (LIFE) before commencing independent environmental law practice before various benches of the National Green Tribunal in 2022.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2031

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us