Odisha
,
Sunabeda
,
Koraput
Published :
Aug 2017
|
Updated :
Villagers displaced by HAL in Odisha Demand Rehabilitation and Return of Unused Land
Reported by
Sandeep Pattnaik
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
24000
People affected
1960
Year started
4856
Land area affected
Households affected
24000
People Affected
1960
Year started
4856
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Defence and Security Establishments
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Defence and Security Establishments
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In the year 1960, The Government of Odisha had handed over a total of 12,000 acres of land to the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) at Sunabeda, Koraput. Total of 10 villages were affected namely, Kaki, Chakarliput, Thalaput, Kadigam, Charangul, Khalpadi, Chulapari, Rajpalama, Bodigam, Chikapar wherein a total of 435 families were displaced and only 138 familes have been rehabilitated. While HAL has been established on 3121.15 acres of land, it has handed over nearly 6,000 acres to various Central institutes, including the Central University of Odisha and the Cobra Batallion, and a private english medium school. Now HAL, has unused 2918.53 acres of land in its hand. The displaced adivasi's under the banner of HAL Displaced Persons Association have been making repeated demands to the district administration and HAL authorities for the overall development of all the affected villages, employment to at least one person of each displaced household, education facilities in peripheral villages and the return of unused land acquired by HAL . They even blocked the roads leading to the factory by felling trees in 2012. In September 2014, land losers forcibly ploughed around 50 acres on its premises. Due to their continuous protest, the HAL authorities could not construct boundary wall. In March 2018, at a one day public hearing organized for those who have been displaced by several projects in Koraput, Malkangiri, Rayagada and Nabarangpur districts, the demand for compensation and rehabilitation was reiterated by the adivasi leader Trilohan Muduli. In an extensive study conducted and published by The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Research and Training Institute in 2020, it was highlighted that 22 villages were displaced by the HAL project despite the government record displaying only 10. Further, the research team discovered that the rehabilitation providedprepared without the consent of those displacedwas inaccessible as it was on the top of a nearby hill devoid of roads for commuting. Worse still, it noted the lack of livelihood opportunities, educational facilities and easy access to basic amenities like drinking water. In May 2021, acting on a petition filed by advocate Radhakanta Tripathy, the National Human Rights Commission directed the Chief Secretary of Odisha to investigate the grievances of individuals displaced and affected by several projects in the Koraput district, including HAL. Mr. Tripathy in his petition requested the NHRC to verify the MoUs signed by HAL and NALCO with the Government of Odisha and determine the real implementation status of Record of Rights, (RoR), rehabilitation and livelihood among others.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for employment

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

4530

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) , The Government of Odisha

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Executive Director Office, HAL, 2021- "we are not in a position to give any information regarding the project right now"

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sandeep Pattnaik

Sandeep is a researcher and journalist based in Bhubaneshwar. He was part of the Human Rights Advocacy Programme at the Centre for the Study of Human Rights, Columbia University, New York, in 2007. Currently, he is a member of the steering committee of the International Campaign for the Ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for employment

Demand for better access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us