Odisha
,
Mugurabeda
,
Balangir
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
Land acquisition and Displacement due to Lower Suktel Irrigation Dam Project in Bolangir, Orissa
Reported by
Sibasish Ray
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
4160
Households affected
People affected
1995
Year started
3936
Land area affected
4160
Households affected
People Affected
1995
Year started
3936
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The proposed Lower Suktel Irrigation Project across river Suktel, a major tributary to Mahanadi river seeks to supply irrigation and drinking water to the Balangir district in Odisha. The initial survey for the project was conducted in 1979 and the Environment and Forest Ministry approved its environment clearance in 1998. As per the plan, a dam was to be built on the Jhareidunguri hill near village Magurbeda in Balangir. Since its inception, the estimated cost of the project has increased from the initial sum of 217.13 crore in 1998 to almost 4,500 crore in 2018.
Despite being a drought-affected district, the local community has staunchly opposed the project since the 1990's. It is estimated to submerge around 5000 hectares of land (severely impacting around 29 villages) and 583 hectares of forest area. A total of 9000 families who are dependent on these lands for their livelihood would be affected by the project. Protesters have organised themselves under the banner of Lower Suktel Budianchal Sangharsha Samiti (LSBAP). In 2013, the protestors including local farmers, adivasis and journalists were met with lathi charges. Further, dedicated resettlement efforts have been lacking with many having been denied due compensation for their lands. There have also been speculations of large scale corruption related to compensation for rehabilitation schemes for the district.
The High Court on May 18, 2016 rejected the land acquisition notification of the state government on the basis of which it had acquired land in proposed lower Suktel River Dam project. Identifying discrepancies in the land acquisition notification process -a division bench consisting of justice Ms Sanju Panda and Justice K.R.Mohapatra rejected the land acquisition for the project. At a time when the Lower Suktel project has gathered political storms the judgement comes as a setback for the state government. However, work on the irrigation project re started on 2017.
While around 70% of the spillwork for the project had already been completed, the project faced yet another derailment from 2018 due to Mahanadi Water dispute. Citing the Minister of State for Water Resources Raghunandan Das, it was reported on February 13, 2021, that the project's resumption was contingent on the verdict by the Mahanadi River Water Disputes Tribunal's. At the end of the month on 28th February, it was reported that the second phase of construction work for the project had begun and that families in 15 out of 29 at- risk villages have been compensated as per Resettlement and Rehabilitation policy, 2006. In February 2021, project chief engineer Niranjan Rout said “Dialogue is on to address other issues. Currently, base stripping work has started.” 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

217.16

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Water Resources, Government of Odisha, Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Program (AIBP) of Central Water Commission, Central Water Commission, Mahanadi River Water Disputes Tribunal

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Local farmers, Indigenous groups or traditional communities

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sibasish Ray
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us