Maharashtra
Nimgaon village
,
Gosasi
,
Pune
Published :
Feb 2022
|
Updated :
Maharashtra Farmers Demand MIDC to Return 15% Developed Land Acquired for SEZ
Reported by
Vaibhav Walunj
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
990
People affected
2010
Year started
1705
Land area affected
Households affected
990
People Affected
2010
Year started
1705
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Gosasi and Nimgaon villages in Rajgurunagar tehsil, 60 kilometres from Pune city, about 990 farmer families have been protesting since 2005 against land acquisition by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) for building an industrial park. Over the years, the families have held massive agitations and protest marches, led by social activists and political leaders. In recent months, the agitation has gained momentum with the declaration of a new project in the disputed area.
Baba Kalyani, a tycoon based in Pune, had acquired 1,705 hectares of land from the farmers of the two villages in the name of Kalyani Group to build a special economic zone (SEZ). When the farmers protested, the Kalyani Group agreed to give back 15 per cent of the acquired land once it was developed. The farmers allege that Kalyani Group has failed to keep its end of the bargain.
Farmer Devidas Raudhal told LCW, "The land was acquired in phases. In the first phase, the land was bought in the name of Khed Economic Infrastructure Private Limited (KEIPL). As the land was developed and the production of goods started, the farmers began to demand back 15 per cent of the land as promised. KEIPL stated that it had already returned the promised land to the farmers. But in reality, the land was allocated to another entity, Khed Developers Limited."
Gosasi village sarpanch Kisan Gorade informed LCW that the farmers who had actually given up their land had no clue about this transfer and were tricked into believing that KEIPL had delivered on its promise. The case is now being heard in the Bombay high court.
In June 2021, Amit Kalyani, a new-generation tycoon of the family, announced that he planned to purchase 175 acres of land in the KHED industrial park with MIDC for a ‘defense products factory’. According to the SEZ Policy, MIDC will acquire land for the industrial park and transfer it to private players for development. This way, MIDC will remain the buyer of land while the private companies will become the owners._ _The farmers have termed this outrageous as the Kalyani Group is yet to deliver on its previous promise of returning 15 per cent of the developed land.
The SEZ is now functional, with many MNCs, including Thyssen Krupp, developing their manufacturing units on the land. As more projects come up, Kalyani Group is likely to acquire more land to expand the SEZ. But the farmers in the surrounding villages have refused to part with their land for any future projects.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to get back acquired land

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

3274.31

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2021

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Khed Economic Infrastructure Private Limited, Khed Developers Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Farmers, Swabhimani Shetkari Sanghatana

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Vaibhav Walunj

Vaibhav is a freelance researcher and journalist working in the tribal and remote regions of Bastar, Gadchiroli, South Kashmir and the NorthEast. He prominently writes about tribal culture, identity, environment and conflicts. His research on regional journalism, nativist literature and global indigenous identity has been published in various journals. He has been engaged in research work with Tata Technologies, Dalit Camera, The Wire - Marathi, NITI Aayog, Pune University and National Commission for Scheduled Tribes.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to get back acquired land

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us