Andhra Pradesh
Pedda Kovvada, Ramachandrapuramu, Gudem, Kottapalem, Tekkali and Jeerukovvada
,
Kalanuthala
,
Prakasam
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
15 Years On, AP Families Displaced by Veligonda Project Fight for Fair Compensation
Reported by
Rahul Maganti
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
3863
Households affected
18542
People affected
2005
Year started
3070
Land area affected
3863
Households affected
18542
People Affected
2005
Year started
3070
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Veligonda Project is an under-construction irrigation project in Andhra Pradesh's Prakasam district under which 43.50 TMC (one thousand million cubic feet) of floodwater from Krishna River will be drawn from the foreshore of the Srisailam Project Reservoir and will be carried in two tunnels to feed into the Nallamala Sagar Reservoir. The construction had commenced in 2005 and was scheduled to be completed by 2008. However, the project has seen several delays and cost escalations, and the revised target of completion is now 2020. The objective of the project is to provide irrigation facilities to 4,47,300 acres of land and drinking water to 15.25 Lakh people in 30 mandals of Prakasam, Nellore and Kadapa Districts who have been affected by flouride contamination of groundwater.
While the government figures indicate that only 472.53 acres of private land are to be acquired, news reports estimate the figure to be 40,000 acres. Eleven villages will submerge due to the damming of the Nallamalla reservoir, affecting 3,863 families. Officials announced a rehabilitation and resettlement package to construct settlement colonies with the entire infrastructure ready in place by the time the families shift. Six relief and rehabilitation centers were identified.
It has been more than a decade since the package was announced, but there has been no progress in the infrastructure works. In the meantime, the number of beneficiaries have increased from 4,300 to 9,000, as the children have grown up and some of them have married.
In 2017, the oustees protested for enhanced compensation as per the 2013 Land Acquisition Act. Veligonda Project Oustees Committee convenor Galli Venkatram Reddy said, “We will soon start ‘Amaravati Chalo’ programme, seeking a better deal for the displaced people.”
By June 2019, the displaced families continued to live in congested houses in their villages waiting for the promised rehabilitation package. They refused to leave even though the government had notified theirs as submerging villages.
Prakasam district joint collector S. Nagalakshmi said the land for remaining settlement colonies at Vemulakota and Ondutla had been identified and that layout proposals were sent to the rehabilitation and resettlement commissioner. She said they were trying to convince the government for a suitable package.
In June 2019, farmers again demanded a better package as per the Land Acquisition Act of 2013 as well as compensation for the delay in implementing the relief packages.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation as number of beneficiaries have increased

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

5150

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

1996

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Irrigation, Government of Andhra Pradesh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Project Displaced People, Veligonda Project Oustees Committee

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Rahul Maganti


Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us