Maharashtra
,
,
Mumbai
Published :
Aug 2024
|
Updated :
Mumbai's Air India colony residents oppose eviction by Adani-led MIAL
Reported by
Shubham Kothari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
350
Households affected
1680
People affected
2021
Year started
74
Land area affected
350
Households affected
1680
People Affected
2021
Year started
74
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

In Mumbai's Kalina Airport Colony, residents live in constant fear of being evicted from their houses, which they believed was their entitlement till their retirement under the Air India's housing allotment rules.

These airport colonies were developed as quarters for Air India staff after it's nationalisation in 1953. In 2018, when the government decided to privatise Air India, the housing entitlement of Air India workers across the nation became unclear.

In March 2022, approximately a month after Air India was handed over to Tata Sons, Gautam Adani-led Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL) issued a notice to the airlines asking it to surrender land that is not core to its operations, including four staff colonies. These colonies were home to 1,600 families.

The agreement between the Union government and the Tata Group to privatise Air India included the distribution of the existing debts and assets between the Tata Group and an asset monetisation company named Air India Assets Holding Limited (AIAHL). The AIAHL was created to monetise the assets held by Air India to cover the debt of Air India taken up by the government of India. 

In September 2021, the Ministry of Civil Aviation decided to inform the Air India staff to vacate the housing quarters in 6 months time. In response to this notification, three unions of Air India workers gave a strike notice with labour commissioner alleging that the eviction notice amounted to withdrawing privileges. They further added that the negotiations between the union and the employer through dispute resolution ended without any decision. The workers wanted to go to the industrial court for resolution of the dispute but Air India authorities contended that housing is not an essential service condition, but just a welfare measure, according to the same Housing Allotment Rules.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition on resolution by an industrial court arguing: "If such a small number of employees continue to hold on to the accommodations, the AIAHL will not be able to monetise the land to reduce the burden of debt of AIL put on it… Petitions are devoid of merit and deserve to be dismissed." Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court ordered eviction of staffers from the Vasant Vihar airport colony in Delhi.  

On 26 January 2022, Air India was privatised. From 26 May 2022, another round of notices were issued to the employees to vacate the quarters by 26 July 2022. Subsequently, the unions went to the Supreme Court in November 2023 where an interim relief against evictions was provided to the residents.

In July 2021, Adani Airports took over the Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL) entrusted with the Management of Mumbai's Airport. In January 2024, the officials of MIAL came with hundreds of policemen and demolition squad to demolish the unused staff quarters in the colony. But the exercise was called off hours later as residents protested against the demolition drive, claiming it to be against the Supreme Court order.

The residents further raised the issue of involvement of MIAL in the process when it was the AIAHL which was the owner of the land. However, the MIAL claimed that the government of Maharashtra and the AIAHL had handed over the land to MIAL and Adani Airport for the expansion of Mumbai Airport.

The 350 families of Airport colony now await the final judgement of Supreme Court in deciding the final interpretation of the Housing allotment rules.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Air India Assets Holding Limited

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Air India

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Adani Airports

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Shubham Kothari

Shubham is a housing rights activist based in Mumbai. He has a post graduate from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai in urban policy and governance.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us