Andhra Pradesh
Kothapalli village in NP Kunta mandal, Veligallu and Thumukunta village in Galliveedu mandal
,
NP Kunta
,
Anantapuramu
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Ananthapuramu solar power park oustees demand higher compensation for their land
Reported by
Rahul Maganti
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
1212
People affected
2014
Year started
2906
Land area affected
Households affected
1212
People Affected
2014
Year started
2906
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The 1500-megaWatt NP Kunta Ultra Mega Solar Park is spread across 11,000 acres in Ananthapuramu district. It commenced operations in 2016 when land was acquired for the same. The solar power park is a joint venture of Andhra Pradesh Solar Power Corporation Pvt Ltd, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd, APTRANSCO, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation, and New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of AP Ltd. They acquired lands from the farmers and leased it to five private power generators (Tata Power Renewable Energy, Azure Power Thirty Six Pvt. Ltd, ACME Solar Holdings Pvt. Ltd, FRV Power India Pvt. Ltd and NTPC) to set up the power plants. The power generated will be purchased by the Solar Energy Corporation of India and then sold to other companies.
Farmers whose lands were acquired for the park staged protests and stated that the state has given them lesser compensation than promised. Leaders of opposition parties, who led the protests, claimed that though the farmers were promised a compensation of INR 2.1 lakh per acre, they had actually received less compensation. Farmers’ protests also disrupted works on construction of the power plants by the private power generators.
In June 2018, the farmers launched an agitation seeking money for the 56 Darakastu Patta (DKT)-holders (Darakastu Patta holders is a category of people in Andhra Pradesh who are assigned government waste land for the sole purpose of cultivation) and 1,156 S. J. Dhar farmers (A category of farmers who till the land). Outgoing Collector G. Veerapandian re-sent the proposals to Principal Secretary (Energy) Ajay Jain, and the then Chief Minister approved it. The revenue authorities identified 932 members out of the 1,156 Dhar farmers and disbursed ₹9.32 crore. While the remaining persons are seeking compensation, new names have been added to the list, allegedly with political backing.
The project work has thus come to a standstill since June 2019. The project and payment of compensation for the land is shelved.
In March 2020, the Andhra Pradesh government proposed three new solar parks in Ananthapuramu district on land that is not under cultivation. This decision was taken after protests against the solar plant on cultivable land. However, there are no reports to suggest whether these are new projects or if it is the Ananthapuramu plant that has been shifted to a new location.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for promised land

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

2016

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/work-on-nambulapulakunta-solar-park-comes-to-a-standstill/article27585237.ece> Besides resistance from community members, conflicting interests of different political parties in the state is also a reason for the project being stalled (Source in above link).

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

National Thermal Power Corporation, AP Solar Power Corporation Pvt Ltd, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd, APTRANSCO, AP Industrial Infrastructure Corporation, New & Renewable Energy Development Corporation of A.P Ltd

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Local farmers

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Rahul Maganti


Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for promised land

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

2016

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/work-on-nambulapulakunta-solar-park-comes-to-a-standstill/article27585237.ece> Besides resistance from community members, conflicting interests of different political parties in the state is also a reason for the project being stalled (Source in above link).

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us