Goa
Pale, Issorcim, Cansaulim, Arossim, Chandor, Mollem
,
Velsao
,
South Goa
Published :
Jun 2022
|
Updated :
May 26, 2023
Goans oppose South Western Railway double-tracking
Reported by
Malavika Neurekar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
30
Households affected
People affected
2020
Year started
1
Land area affected
30
Households affected
People Affected
2020
Year started
1
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Railways
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Railways
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In February 2022, the Velsao Panchayat, which administers the villages of Velsao, Pale and Issorcim in South Goa, moved the High Court against double-tracking of the South Western Railway line between Hospet in Karnataka and Vasco da Gama in Goa. The local body claimed that it had not been consulted before the project was approved and the required permits had not been acquired. Six private landowners in Velsao have approached the High Court separately on similar grounds. Residents of Cansaulim-Arossim-Cuelim panchayat area were also agitating against the acquisition of land for the project, but their panchayat said it did not have the authority to take action.

Of the entire stretch that the railway line will cut through in Goa, Velsao-Pale-Issorcem is one of the most densely-populated areas, said Olencio Simoes, joint secretary of Goencho Ekvott, a civil society organisation that is leading the protests against the double tracking project. Protests in the area picked up pace in November 2021, when villagers came out in large numbers to oppose the land survey and demarcation work being carried out by Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (RVNL). According to Olencio Simoes, RVNL officials forcefully entered private land and installed barbed wires to fence off the land.

Residents said the existing railway track passing through the village has been built on land that has still not been acquired. “When the existing track was laid in 1890, this land was given by the people as a ‘gift’ to the Portuguese government. The Railway continues to use the land but ownership belongs to the original land owners,” said Simoes. Heritage conservationist groups and activists say that double tracking will increase vibrations from the train movement and cause cracks in the homes lined along the road.

A larger state-wide agitation has been brewing in Goa since June 2020 against the section of the proposed rail line that would cut through the Bhagwan Mahaveer Sanctuary and Mollem National Park. The double-tracking of South Western Railways is one of the three linear projects in the state sanctioned in December 2019 and April 2020 during the first lockdown, allegedly without adequate debate and consultation. The other two projects were the laying of an additional transmission line and the widening of National Highway 4A. The railway line, which would cut across 342 km of land in the two states of Goa and Karnataka, is divided into two phases: Hospet-Tinaighat and Tinaighat-Vasco. The Castle Rock-Kulem stretch of Phase II cuts through 120 hectares of forest land, including 113 hectares of protected land, and the Kulem-Margao section of the same phase cuts through 16 ha of forest land, including 14 hectares of protected area. As many as 59,000 trees are likely to be cut for the three projects.

In early 2020, Goa’s civil society erupted in a series of marches, study groups, created protest art, and launched a massive awareness campaign. Citizen movements like Goyant Kollso Naka (‘No Coal in Goa’), Aamchem Mollem (‘Our Mollem’), and Goenche Ekvott led the agitation. They highlighted the wealth of biodiversity housed in the protected forest stretch and pointed to shortcomings in the Environment Impact Assessment reports ([here](http://www.dstegoa.gov.in/EIA report from Kulem-Madgaon Section.pdf) and [here](http://www.dstegoa.gov.in/EIA report from Kulem to Castlerock Section.pdf)). These included problems like vague methodology, glaring omissions of certain species, undercounting of mammal species, and lax standards of monitoring.

On May 9, 2022, the Supreme Court struck down the environmental clearance granted by the National Board for Wildlife to a 26 Kilometre stretch extending from Castle rock in Karnataka to Kulem in Goa. This verdict came in light of the recommendations of the Centrally Empowered Committee (CEC) constituted by the Court for examining the clearance. The apex court also noted that the capacity of the existing track is underutilised. However, work beyond the Kulem stretch – which includes Velsao, Cansaulim, and Chandor, among others is continuing. Villagers have pointed out that it is a waste of money to continue work on one stretch when proposed work on another section has been struck down.

In early August 2022, the High Court dismissed a separate petition filed by a group of citizens of Chandor and Girdolim who have organised themselves under the banner 'Ganv Bhavancho Ekvott'. Their petition was against the double tracking work being carried out on their village land. Similarly, the Court dismissed the petition filed by Velsao Panchayat on October 11, 2022. In both cases, the High Court noted that the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 would override the need for prior permissions from state legislations, such as the Panchayat Raj Act of 1994.

Goenche Ekvott members said they would challenge the verdict in the Supreme court. On ground, RVNL's work and protest by villagers has been ongoing. Most recently, in January 2023, RVNL’s attempt to build a 260-metre service track was met with opposition from locals. Residents said the land where the work in ongoing is private property and there has been no agreement over acquisition.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest, Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

10

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Out on bail

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 141 (Unlawful assembly), Section 339 (Wrongful restraint), Section 146 (Rioting)

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Yes

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2127

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2019

Page Number In Investment Document:

4

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Goa state government, South western railways, Velsao panchayat, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Union of India

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Goenche Ekvott, Goyant Kollso Naka, Aamchem Mollem, Goa Foundation

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

10

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Out on bail

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 141 (Unlawful assembly), Section 339 (Wrongful restraint), Section 146 (Rioting)

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Yes

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Malavika Neurekar

Malavika graduated from Azim Premji University with a Master's in Development. She has worked as a journalist and has written for Hindustan Times, Scroll and Mint Lounge.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Yes

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us