Chhattisgarh
,
Mohrenga, Math, Murra and Kharora villages in Tilda tehsil
,
Raipur
Published :
Jun 2017
|
Updated :
October 13, 2025
Limestone mining, water security, and rural resistance in the Pendravan Reservoir conflict in Chhattisgarh's Raipur
Reported by
Asha Verma
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
3470
Households affected
5000
People affected
2015
Year started
689.05
ha.
Land area affected
3470
Households affected
5000
People Affected
2015
Year started
689.05
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Limestone Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Limestone Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Pendravan, also known as Pandit Lakhan Lal Mishra Reservoir, constructed in 1909, is the primary source of water and irrigation for over 12 villages in Tilda tehsil in Raipur district. The reservoir, located near the Mohrenga and Khaulidabri protected forests, is a nesting location for many migratory birds during winters. 

In 2012, UltraTech Cement received a lease for open cast limestone mining in the area where the reservoir is located. A total of 689 hectares of land was allotted to the company, of which 658.451 hectares was private land. The Water Resources Department issued a conditional No Objection Certificate (NOC). People and politicians have been protesting since fearing the impact of mining on the reservoir. 

On 18 August 2015, the Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board organised a public hearing for the environmental clearance (EC) of the project. Villagers and elected representatives used the platform to raise their concerns about the decreasing irrigation capacity of the reservoir due to mining. In August 2016, the project received the EC. 

However, following objections raised in the Legislative Assembly, the agriculture and water resources minister decided to cancel the NOC, according to a news report. On 3 January 2017, the Water Resource Department issued a revised NOC for the mining project located 50 metres from the water body. The NOC stated that the reservoir adjoining the mine would not be affected by mining activities. However, activists argued that mining could damage the walls of the dam resulting in seepage, which could cause loss of water as, according to the Environment Impact Assessment, the open cast mining would be fully mechanised with the use of detonators and deep hole blasting technique. 

Following the issuance of the NOC, farmers from over 12 villages came together to protest under the banner of Pendravan Jalashay Bachao Kisan Sangharsh Samiti and demanded cancellation of the NOC. They had the support of multiple political parties. Protesters even formed a human chain near the dam and organised multiple protests in Raipur to draw the media’s attention.  

On 3 March 2017, the state cancelled the NOC to pacify the farmers. But UltraTech Cement filed a petition with the state High Court. On 19 May 2017, the High Court granted interim relief to UltraTech while stating that a public interest litigation was filed on behalf of the farmers.

In April 2024, the Chhattisgarh High Court directed the state Water Resources Department to reconsider its earlier cancellation of an NOC granted to Ultratech. Local groups, including the Chhattisgarh Bachao Andolan and the Pendravan Reservoir Bachao Kisan Sangharsh Samiti, urged the government not to re-issue the NOC, warning that mining would destroy the reservoir, create severe water shortages in the Kharora and Sargaon areas, and cause pollution. Activists announced plans to submit a memorandum to the Chief Minister, calling for the protection of the reservoir and the cancellation of the mining lease.

Speaking to LCW, Ghanshyam Verma, Secretary of the Pendravan Reservoir Bachao Kisan Sangharsh Samiti, said, “We met the Chief Minister later that month [14 July 2024] at the Vidhan Sabha and explained how the reservoir is crucial to our livelihood. If the project goes ahead, we will suffer greatly. The CM assured us the project would not move forward, but since then the matter has gone cold and we have not heard anything for a year.”

Despite these assurances, the 689.5 hectares in question remain with UltraTech, leaving farmers with uncertainity about the project’s future.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled due to protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.dailypioneer.com/2017/state-editions/govt-bends-under-farmers-stir-cancels-noc-in-pendravan.html> <https://cgkhabar.com/pendravan-to-altratech-20170919/> [Government withdrew NOC given for the project after farmer's protest; but the mine was later transferred to Ultra Tech. The project remains stalled due to pending litigation in High Court. But no data is available regarding the litigation.]

Total investment involved (in Crores):

106

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

1990

Page Number In Investment Document:

3

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Chhattisgarh Water Resources Department, Directorate of Geology and Mining

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Ultratech Cement Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Pendravan Jalashay Bachao Kisan Sangharsh Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Asha Verma
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project stalled due to protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.dailypioneer.com/2017/state-editions/govt-bends-under-farmers-stir-cancels-noc-in-pendravan.html> <https://cgkhabar.com/pendravan-to-altratech-20170919/> [Government withdrew NOC given for the project after farmer's protest; but the mine was later transferred to Ultra Tech. The project remains stalled due to pending litigation in High Court. But no data is available regarding the litigation.]

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us