Chhattisgarh
,
Mohrenga, Math, Murra and Kharora villages in Tilda tehsil
,
Raipur
Published :
Jun 2017
|
Updated :
Farmers Oppose Limestone Mining by Ultratech Cement near Pendravan Reservoir in Chhattisgarh
Reported by
Asha Verma
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
5000
People affected
2015
Year started
689
Land area affected
Households affected
5000
People Affected
2015
Year started
689
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Limestone Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Limestone Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Pendravan, also known as Pandit Lakhan Lal Mishra Reservoir, constructed in 1909, is the primary source of water and irrigation for over 12 villages in Tilda tehsil in Raipur district. The reservoir, located near the Mohrenga and Khaulidabri protected forests, is a nesting location for many migratory birds during winters.  In 2012, UltraTech Cement received a lease for open cast limestone mining in the area where the reservoir is located. A total of 689 hectares of land was allotted to the company, of which 658.451 hectares was private land. The Water Resources Department issued a conditional No Objection Certificate (NOC). People and politicians have been protesting since fearing the impact of mining on the reservoir.  On August 18, 2015, the Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board organised a public hearing for the environmental clearance (EC) of the project. Villagers and elected representatives used the platform to raise their concerns about the decreasing irrigation capacity of the reservoir due to mining. In August 2016, the project received the EC.  However, following objections raised in the Legislative Assembly, the agriculture and water resources minister decided to cancel the NOC, according to a news report.  On January 3, 2017, the Water Resource Department issued a revised NOC for the mining project located 50 metres from the water body.  The NOC stated that the reservoir adjoining the mine would not be affected by mining activities. However, activists argued that mining could damage the walls of the dam resulting in seepage, which could cause loss of water as, according to the Environment Impact Assessment, the open cast mining would be fully mechanised with the use of detonators and deep hole blasting technique.  Following the issuance of the NOC, farmers from over 12 villages came together to protest under the banner of Pendravan Jalashay Bachao Kisan Sangharsh Samiti and demanded cancellation of the NOC. They had the support of multiple political parties. Protesters even formed a human chain near the dam and organised multiple protests in Raipur to draw the medias attention.   On March 3, 2017, the state cancelled the NOC to pacify the farmers. But UltraTech Cement filed a petition with the state high court. On May 19, 2017, the high court granted interim relief to UltraTech while stating that a public interest litigation was filed on behalf of the farmers. At present, the matter of the mining lease is pending before the high court.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

106

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Chhattisgarh Water Resources Department, Directorate of Geology and Mining

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Ultratech Cement Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Janabhivyakti, Chhattisgarh Janta Congress, MLA Bhupesh Baghel of Indian National Congress, Devji Patel of Bhartiya Janta Party

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Asha Verma
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us