Uttar Pradesh
,
Surma
,
Lakhimpur Kheri
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Villagers in UP's Dudwa Tiger Reserve Face Human Rights Violations, Eviction Notices
Reported by
Eleonora Fanari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
2000
People affected
1978
Year started
1000
Land area affected
Households affected
2000
People Affected
1978
Year started
1000
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Dudhwa Tiger Reserve is a protected area in Uttar Pradesh that stretches across the Lakhimpur Kheri and Bahraich districts and comprises the Dudhwa National Park, Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary and Katarniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary. The region which spans across 46 villages is largely occupied by the tribal Tharu community. The tribal community depend on forest for their livelihood, including collecting grass from the forests to make and repair their huts every year. However, after the rejection of the community forest rights claims in July 2019 by the Supreme court, in a larger Forest rights case, the locals say that the forest department officials are extorting money from them and stopping them to collect grass or other forest produce. The Uttar Pradesh government declared Dudhwa as a national park in 1978. After the declaration, 44 villages were relocated outside the forest on revenue land. However, with the implementation of Forest Rights Act in 2006, the people started demanding their rights over forest. In 2013, the tribal members filed claims which the Sub Divisional Level Committee (SDLC) recognised and forwarded it to forest department who rejected it. Despite over more than a decade, the villagers still struggle to get recognition of their rights under the Forest Rights Act. Rajnish Gambhir from the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP) say that when the petitions filed by the tribal community members await the Supreme court hearing, the tharu tribals are continuously harassed and threatened over using forest produce. There have been investigative reports by Journalist Nidheesh J Villatt on the brutal atrocities committed by forest officials on tribal members especially women. The reports highlight that to divide those fighting for their rights, forest officials have allegedly formed vigilante groups Pranthiya Rashak Dal under the garb of protecting forests. He claims that the "Pranthiya Rashak Dal, Dudhwa (PRD) is like the Salwa Judum militia of Chhattisgarh". In 2015, the files of the locals went missing from the administration. The local residents alongside the AIUFWP resubmitted duplicate files to ensure the recognition of their claims in 2016. However, this did not yield any results. There has been constant suppression by the forest officials. There have been several cases which have been registered against the Tharu tribal. In April 2016, 75yearold Bhanduram of Jayanagar village was arrested allegedly on false charges. In August 2020, in another such incident, the Deputy Director of Dudhwa National Park, Manoj Kumar Sonkar allegedly molested and hurled abuses at a Tharu woman who was rearing goats in the forest. Earlier in July, forest officials clashed with tribal members from Kajaria village after forest officials came to the village and allegedly fired shots in the air, molested a few women and beat up youngsters of the community. FIR's have been lodged in both the cases. In February 2021, Allahabad High Court gave an order to seek action into allegations made y Lucknow based petitioner claiming that the locals resort to poaching and sought their relocation.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest and Non-Forest, Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Environment, Forest and Climate Change Department, Forest Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP), Tharu Adivasi Mahila Mazdoor Kisan Manch, Tharu Tribes

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Eleonora Fanari
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us