Assam
Barak Valley inside the inner line of Reserve Forest, Hailkandi
,
Geleky Forest Reserve
,
Sivasagar
Published :
Sep 2024
|
Updated :
28 hectares of forest land diverted for commando camp in Assam
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2024
Year started
28
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2024
Year started
28
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Defence and Security Establishments
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Defence and Security Establishments
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Assam, 28 hectares of forest land in Sivasagar district’s Geleky Forest Reserve at the Assam-Nagaland border has been diverted for the construction of second Assam Commando Battalion Camp.

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has sent notices to various authorities, including the Assam government, the Assam Forest Department, the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEFCC), the District Commissioner of Sivasagar, and the Divisional Forest Officer in response to a petition filed by environmental activist Rohit Choudhury. The petitioner claimed that MK Yadava, the former Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Head of Forest Force in Assam, unlawfully redirected 28 hectares of forest land for construction of second Assam Commando Battalion Camp in the Geleky Forest Reserve.
 
The plea stated that Yadava, now the Special Chief Secretary (Forests) for Assam, misused “his power and position to illegally divert a large part of the forest area without fulfilling the requirements of Compensatory Afforestation and Net Present Value, which makes him personally liable for compensating and restoring the damage done to the forest.”
 
As per the petition, the diversion violates the Van (Sanrakshan Evam Samvardhan) Adhiniyam, 1980 and the latest guidelines of the Central Government dated 29 December, 2023. According to the Forest (Conservation) Law, 1980, diversion of forest land for activities unrelated to forestry must receive prior approval from the MoEFCC.
 
In an order dated 29 May 2024, the NGT ordered the formation of a committee to investigate these claims, highlighting that the issue involves significant environmental concerns and potential violations of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The committee includes the Additional Director General of Forests from the MoEFCC, an Additional Secretary nominated by the MoEFCC Secretary, and the Deputy Director General of Forests(C) from the MoEFCC's Integrated Regional Office in Meghalaya.

Meanwhile, the NGT's New Delhi bench is hearing another case of illegal diversion of protected forest land. In January 2024, the NGT bench had taken up a suo-moto case concerning the purported illegal use of 44 hectares of protected forest land for establishing the Assam Police's Commando Battalion near the Assam-Mizoram border in Inner Line Reserve Forest, Hailakandi district. In this case too, Yadava had allegedly approved the construction within a protected forest, reportedly to prevent encroachment by individuals from Mizoram. This decision incited significant concern among local conservationists.
 
Consequently, on 28 March 2024, the Union Ministry of Environment acknowledged that the battalion's construction violated the Forest Conservation Amendment Act. The Assam government subsequently informed the NGT that it had stopped the construction of the commando camp on the 44 hectares in Hailakandi. 

The MoEFCC regional office in Shillong gave a show cause notice to MK Yadava on 14 May 2024. The notice declared him guilty of the offense and gave him 60 days to respond, failing which legal action would be taken. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

State Of Assam, Department Of Environment and Forest, Assam, Ministry Of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, Office of the District Commissioner, Sivasagar, Divisional Forest Officer, Sivasagar Division

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us