Maharashtra
Pipariya, Chargaon, Khapa, Salai, etc.
,
Wagholi
,
Nagpur
Published :
Mar 2025
|
Updated :
Villagers near Pench Tiger Reserve allege they were fraudulently made to give up FRA claims
Reported by
Sukriti Vats
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Sourabh Rai, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
56
People affected
2022
Year started
21
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
56
People Affected
2022
Year started
21
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of Wagholi in the buffer zone of Maharashtra's Pench Tiger Reserve first filed Community Forest Rights (CFR) claims along with another nearby village over 351.16 hectares in 2015. Those forest lands were used to collect tendu patta (Diospyros melanoxylon), mahua (Madhuca longifolia), chara (feedstock), wood, and wild vegetables. 

In 2018, they found that those claims did not move beyond the Sub-Divisional Level Committee (SDLC). Lacking awareness of how the Forest Rights Act (FRA) operated, they were informed by SDLC authorities that their claims were rejected due to insufficient evidence and that additional proof was needed. Even the Gram Sabha, responsible for accepting claims at the initial level, was unaware of the documentation requirements.

From then onwards, the villagers hoped to file Individual Forest Rights claims by using proper evidence. Hansraj, one of the villagers, had about 2 acres of land (0.78 hectares), where he grew cotton, toor dal (Pigeon pea), etc. He told LCW that forest officials, under the tactic of helping villagers, collected evidence of occupation and issued fines for encroachment. Hansraj was told that he would be able to use these fine receipts to claim rights under FRA. However, being illiterate, he struggled with the document, which was printed in extremely small letters and fading due to poor ink quality.

About 7-8 families from Pipariya Gram Panchayat paid Rs 1,000 each in 2022, Rs 500 more than the stipulated amount of fine, without realising that the receipt claimed that they were giving up their rights on forest land.

According to a letter sent by the Paoni Forest Range Officer to the Sarpanch of Group Gram Panchayat (Pipariya/Deolapar/Dahoda/Dongartal, etc) in August, there were as many as 56 such individuals from the Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST) and Other Backward Community (OBC) who “gave up their claims”.

The letter claimed that forest offences were issued and then dismissed against those illegally encroaching on the forest land after a survey was carried out in the Paoni forest area in the financial year 2022-23. This was done on the condition that these encroachers “voluntarily abandoned” the encroached land. 

“But it has been noticed that the concerned encroachment holders are submitting the forest rights claim to their respective Gram Panchayats. (S)uch forest right claim should not be accepted,” it stated.

Praveen, the former _Sarpanch told LCW that _many villagers came to him, demanding titles and, since he was educated he could understand what was written and advised everyone against paying fines. He created awareness among the villages under his supervision.

Meanwhile, Hansraj has been frequently visiting the district authorities for the last two years to retract the statement authorised by his signature. But the authorities have not budged yet.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Show more work
Latest updates
Thiruvallur
Tamil Nadu

NGT suspends environmental clearance for SIPCOT project in Tamil Nadu's Gummidipoondi

Thane
Maharashtra

6,500 families seek rehabilitation as Kalyan-Dombivli civic body begins demolition of over 60 illegal buildings

Nandurbar
Maharashtra

Tribespeople in villages of Nandurbar district oppose construction of additional pipeline in their area in Maharashtra

Ukhrul, Kamjong, Tengnoupal, Chandel
Manipur

Several mining agreements in Manipur granted without villagers' consent, environmental clearances

Jaisalmer
Rajasthan

Adani solar plant threatens fertile belt in Jaisalmer's Bhimsar village

Nagpur
Maharashtra

Nagpur authorities raze houses of violence accused citing unauthorised construction

Mehsana
Gujarat

Gujarat's Bamosana village opposes construction of power line poles on agricultural land

West Tripura
Tripura

Small traders at Lake Chowmuhani market in Agartala protest eviction, demand rehabilitation

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us