Andhra Pradesh
,
Kondapur mandal
,
Kadapa
Published :
Jan 2017
|
Updated :
Gandikota Reservoir in AP Submerges 6 Villages, People Yet to be Rehabilitated
Reported by
Rahul Maganti
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
9000
Households affected
43200
People affected
2006
Year started
Land area affected
9000
Households affected
43200
People Affected
2006
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Gandikota reservoir project was first conceived in 2006 as part of the Galeru Nagari project to provide irrigation water to the farmers of Pulivendula in Kadapa district. However, the 26 TMC (Thousand Million Cubic Feet) reservoir is expected to submerge 22 villages in Kondapuram mandal in the district.
The land acquisition in the villages falling in the submergence zone was completed prior to 2009, but the residents are still in possession of the land. Many affected families are yet to receive any kind of compensation and rehabilitation measures promised to them by the government. The state claims that 3,300 of the 9,000 families estimated to be displaced by the project have availed the compensation and rehabilitation and resettlement package and 5,700 families are yet to get the benefits.
In 2015, the residents of Choutupalli, one of the worst-affected villages, blocked roads and staged _dharnas _to assert their right to farm the land (that they still possess) they had been cultivating for 40 years. In September 2015, a special package of INR 1 lakh was granted to the villagers but later cancelled in 2017.
In late 2016, the state began releasing water from the reservoir without any warning, submerging six villages and leaving its residents homeless.
In January 2017, the National Alliance of People's movement approached the National Human Rights Commission regarding the submergence of the villages. The body alleged that the state government did not follow due process of the law and rehabilitation measures as per the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, and Andhra Pradesh Rehabilitation Policy, 2005.
In August 2017, the government started acquiring more land in the three other villages of Kondapuram mandal to increase the capacity of the reservoir.
In May 2020, the state released INR 145.94 crore to be given to the affected families in Kondapuram.
In September, 1,300 families from the Tallaproddutur village were evicted without providing them the compensation and rehabilitation package. The villagers claim that the Jogulpuram resettlement colony, where they are supposed to be resettled, is not yet constructed completely. After opposition to the eviction escalated, around 400 police personnel were deployed in the village. The residents have alleged that the police officials too have harassed them.
A PIL was filed at the Andhra Pradesh High Court in September, 2020 by Jana Sena functionary and environmental activist Bolisetty Satyanarayana with urgent directions to the state government to not evict people affected by the Gandikota Project. The Court dismissed the petition in December, 2020 stating that all the Awards were passed and physical possession was taken much before 2013, and on this basis rejected the demand of the petitioner.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Andhra Pradesh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Local residents

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Rahul Maganti


Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us