Protests against environmental damage due to NHIDCL's highway widening project in Mizoram

Reported by

East Street Journal Asia

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Updated by

Published on

June 17, 2024

June 24, 2024

Edited on

June 17, 2024

Sector

Land Use

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Environmental/Ecological Damage

Highway widening projects, Destruction of forests, Pollution

Starting Year

2020

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

73600

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

2037

People Affected by Conflict

9777

State

Mizoram

Sector

Land Use

People Affected by Conflict

9777

Households Affected by Conflict

2037

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

73600

ha

Starting Year

2020

Location of Conflict

Saitual

Tawipui North-2, Tawipui North-1, Tawipui South, Thingfal, Thingka, AOC, Saika, Chawntlangpui, Sihtlangpui, Kawlchaw, Zero point, Maubawk, Theiva, Theihri, Tuipang village and Lawngtlai City, Serchhip, Hnahthial, Aizawl, Champhai, Lunglei, Tlabung and Thanzawl

Aizawl

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Environmental/Ecological Damage

Highway widening projects, Destruction of forests, Pollution

Land Conflict Summary

Locals and environmental activists in Mizoram have slammed the National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) for violating environmental laws and regulations while undertaking highway projects in the state.

Activists have alleged environmental laws violations in four national highways widening projects by NHIDCL in Mizoram namely: NH-09 (27.247 KM stretch between Seling and Zokhawthar), NH-102B (323 KM stretch between Keifang and Manipur), NH-302 (10 KM stretch between Lunglei-Tlabung), and NH-54 (372 KM stretch between Aizawl and Tuipang). NHIDCL's website states that NH-54 widening is a joint venture by Gawar Pvt Ltd and SCCPL.

On 19 July 2022, over 2,000 people participated in a rally led by the Youth for Environment Justice Mizoram (YEJM) against these projects in Mizoram’s capital city Aizawl. During the rally, spearheaded by social activist Vanramchhuangi, the protesters alleged that rivers and forest lands are being destroyed indiscriminately due to the construction or widening of National Highways across Mizoram.

In its memorandum to the office of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (PCCF), the YEJM alleged that the NHIDCL has completely disregarded and violated Environment Management Plan (EMP) within the framework of the EIA and also social considerations while disposing of their spoil soils by callously shoving them down the constructed slope, wiping away all biodiversity which are in the way of the disposed spoil soils. It demanded an immediate stay order for highway projects of NHIDCL.

In response to a silent protest by Vanramchhuangi, the Mizoram government in May 2022 instructed Divisional Forest Officers to visit construction sites where the NHIDCL is widening national highways. Following the DFOs visit, the government issued a stay order to the NHIDCL to stop its work in some construction sites following the discovery of environmental violations.

Deputy Commissioner of Saitual, VL Hruaizela, informed that a vast area of forest land, rivers, rivulets, or streams, and ponds have been destroyed due to failure to dispose of soil to ‘spoil bank’ by the NHIDCL. He also said two people have so far died in landslides caused by unscrupulous disposal of soil and unsystematic construction of highways by the construction company.

YEJM activist Lalrinfela Khiangte says that the project had mostly affected the Situal, Serchhip, and Hnahthial districts. “The spoiled soil deposited along the banks of the river has destroyed the crops grown here and made the land unfit for agricultural use,” she said.

Meanwhile, the Mizoram Pollution Control Board issued a show cause notice to the NHIDCL after earth spoils were dumped in a way that caused river pollution. The committee is still carrying out inspections, but most of them have reported violations.

As mentioned by NHIDCL in its official website, the widening work of NH-54 is being executed in a joint venture by Gawar Pvt Ltd and SCCPL and was scheduled to be completed by July 2023. Whereas the expansion of NH-6 is executed by GVV Constructions and NG Projects and the project was scheduled to be completed by January 2022.

The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways had set the target to complete the work on NH102B by August 2023. The work on NH302 was to be completed by 30 December 2022, the revised date of completion is 31 December 2024. 

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

<https://www.projectsmonitor.com/daily-wire/nhidcl-floats-tender-for-upgradation-of-pawlrang-rulchawm-section-in-mizoram/> <https://nhidcl.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/NHIDCL-Project-Status-as-on-31.01.2024-for-uploading-on-Portal.pdf>

Total investment involved (in Crores):

14900

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

1

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [Restriction on diverting forest for that deals with diversion of forest land for non forest purposes]
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Point 7(III) [Prior to the grant of Environmental Clearance, public consultation needs to be carried out to hear the concerns of affected persons or stakeholders due to environmental impact of a proposed project] Schedule, Item 7(f) [List of projects requiring prior environmental clearance include Highways]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

National Green Tribunal (Eastern Zone)

Case Number

Original Application No.26/2023/EZ; Original Application No.173/2023/EZ (I.A. No.62/2023/EZ);

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

An original application (OA 26/2023) was filed before the National Green Tribunal (Eastern Zone) to contest the throwing of debris during the construction of the road. The NGT took up the case in March 2023. The petitioners contended that the 62 disposal sites which had been demarcated by the National Highway Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) were insufficient. On August 11, 2023, the state government through the state pollution control board submitted that environmental compensation to the extent of Rs. 5,90,70,000 had been imposed against NHIDCL. The matter is ongoing and is next slated to be heard on July 25, 2024.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Advocacy (for inclusion in courts)

Protests/marches

Media-based activism/alternative media

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Public campaign

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Mizoram Pollution Control Board, Mizoram Forest Department, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change ( MoEFCC)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL)

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Joint venture by Gawar Pvt Ltd and SCCPL; GVV Constructions and NG Projects

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Locals and environmental activists in Mizoram have slammed the National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) for violating environmental laws and regulations while undertaking highway projects in the state.

Activists have alleged environmental laws violations in four national highways widening projects by NHIDCL in Mizoram namely: NH-09 (27.247 KM stretch between Seling and Zokhawthar), NH-102B (323 KM stretch between Keifang and Manipur), NH-302 (10 KM stretch between Lunglei-Tlabung), and NH-54 (372 KM stretch between Aizawl and Tuipang). NHIDCL's website states that NH-54 widening is a joint venture by Gawar Pvt Ltd and SCCPL.

On 19 July 2022, over 2,000 people participated in a rally led by the Youth for Environment Justice Mizoram (YEJM) against these projects in Mizoram’s capital city Aizawl. During the rally, spearheaded by social activist Vanramchhuangi, the protesters alleged that rivers and forest lands are being destroyed indiscriminately due to the construction or widening of National Highways across Mizoram.

In its memorandum to the office of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (PCCF), the YEJM alleged that the NHIDCL has completely disregarded and violated Environment Management Plan (EMP) within the framework of the EIA and also social considerations while disposing of their spoil soils by callously shoving them down the constructed slope, wiping away all biodiversity which are in the way of the disposed spoil soils. It demanded an immediate stay order for highway projects of NHIDCL.

In response to a silent protest by Vanramchhuangi, the Mizoram government in May 2022 instructed Divisional Forest Officers to visit construction sites where the NHIDCL is widening national highways. Following the DFOs visit, the government issued a stay order to the NHIDCL to stop its work in some construction sites following the discovery of environmental violations.

Deputy Commissioner of Saitual, VL Hruaizela, informed that a vast area of forest land, rivers, rivulets, or streams, and ponds have been destroyed due to failure to dispose of soil to ‘spoil bank’ by the NHIDCL. He also said two people have so far died in landslides caused by unscrupulous disposal of soil and unsystematic construction of highways by the construction company.

YEJM activist Lalrinfela Khiangte says that the project had mostly affected the Situal, Serchhip, and Hnahthial districts. “The spoiled soil deposited along the banks of the river has destroyed the crops grown here and made the land unfit for agricultural use,” she said.

Meanwhile, the Mizoram Pollution Control Board issued a show cause notice to the NHIDCL after earth spoils were dumped in a way that caused river pollution. The committee is still carrying out inspections, but most of them have reported violations.

As mentioned by NHIDCL in its official website, the widening work of NH-54 is being executed in a joint venture by Gawar Pvt Ltd and SCCPL and was scheduled to be completed by July 2023. Whereas the expansion of NH-6 is executed by GVV Constructions and NG Projects and the project was scheduled to be completed by January 2022.

The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways had set the target to complete the work on NH102B by August 2023. The work on NH302 was to be completed by 30 December 2022, the revised date of completion is 31 December 2024. 

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Type of Common Land

Forest and Non-Forest

Total investment involved (in Crores):

14900

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

1

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [Restriction on diverting forest for that deals with diversion of forest land for non forest purposes]
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006
Point 7(III) [Prior to the grant of Environmental Clearance, public consultation needs to be carried out to hear the concerns of affected persons or stakeholders due to environmental impact of a proposed project] Schedule, Item 7(f) [List of projects requiring prior environmental clearance include Highways]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

National Green Tribunal (Eastern Zone)

Case Number

Original Application No.26/2023/EZ; Original Application No.173/2023/EZ (I.A. No.62/2023/EZ);

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

An original application (OA 26/2023) was filed before the National Green Tribunal (Eastern Zone) to contest the throwing of debris during the construction of the road. The NGT took up the case in March 2023. The petitioners contended that the 62 disposal sites which had been demarcated by the National Highway Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) were insufficient. On August 11, 2023, the state government through the state pollution control board submitted that environmental compensation to the extent of Rs. 5,90,70,000 had been imposed against NHIDCL. The matter is ongoing and is next slated to be heard on July 25, 2024.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Nature of Protest

Advocacy (for inclusion in courts)

Protests/marches

Media-based activism/alternative media

Complaints/petitions/letters/memorandums to officials

Public campaign

Campaigns (grassroots organisations/press releases/media)

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Mizoram Pollution Control Board, Mizoram Forest Department, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change ( MoEFCC)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL)

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Joint venture by Gawar Pvt Ltd and SCCPL; GVV Constructions and NG Projects

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch
cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now
    Mizoram
    Tawipui North-2, Tawipui North-1, Tawipui South, Thingfal, Thingka, AOC, Saika, Chawntlangpui, Sihtlangpui, Kawlchaw, Zero point, Maubawk, Theiva, Theihri, Tuipang village and Lawngtlai City, Serchhip, Hnahthial, Aizawl, Champhai, Lunglei, Tlabung and Thanzawl
    ,
    Saitual
    ,
    Aizawl
    Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
    Protests against environmental damage due to NHIDCL's highway widening project in Mizoram
    Reported by
    East Street Journal Asia
    Legal Review by
    Anmol Gupta
    Updated by
    Anupa Kujur
    2037
    Households affected
    9777
    People Affected
    2020
    Year started
    73600
    Land area affected
    2037
    Households affected
    9777
    People Affected
    2020
    Year started
    73600
    Land area affected
    Key Insights
    Sector
    Land Use
    Reason/Cause of conflict
    Environmental/Ecological Damage
    Conflict Status
    Ongoing
    Ended
    Legal Status
    Region Classification
    Urban and Rural
    Ended
    1
    Summary

    Locals and environmental activists in Mizoram have slammed the National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) for violating environmental laws and regulations while undertaking highway projects in the state.

    Activists have alleged environmental laws violations in four national highways widening projects by NHIDCL in Mizoram namely: NH-09 (27.247 KM stretch between Seling and Zokhawthar), NH-102B (323 KM stretch between Keifang and Manipur), NH-302 (10 KM stretch between Lunglei-Tlabung), and NH-54 (372 KM stretch between Aizawl and Tuipang). NHIDCL's website states that NH-54 widening is a joint venture by Gawar Pvt Ltd and SCCPL.

    On 19 July 2022, over 2,000 people participated in a rally led by the Youth for Environment Justice Mizoram (YEJM) against these projects in Mizoram’s capital city Aizawl. During the rally, spearheaded by social activist Vanramchhuangi, the protesters alleged that rivers and forest lands are being destroyed indiscriminately due to the construction or widening of National Highways across Mizoram.

    In its memorandum to the office of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (PCCF), the YEJM alleged that the NHIDCL has completely disregarded and violated Environment Management Plan (EMP) within the framework of the EIA and also social considerations while disposing of their spoil soils by callously shoving them down the constructed slope, wiping away all biodiversity which are in the way of the disposed spoil soils. It demanded an immediate stay order for highway projects of NHIDCL.

    In response to a silent protest by Vanramchhuangi, the Mizoram government in May 2022 instructed Divisional Forest Officers to visit construction sites where the NHIDCL is widening national highways. Following the DFOs visit, the government issued a stay order to the NHIDCL to stop its work in some construction sites following the discovery of environmental violations.

    Deputy Commissioner of Saitual, VL Hruaizela, informed that a vast area of forest land, rivers, rivulets, or streams, and ponds have been destroyed due to failure to dispose of soil to ‘spoil bank’ by the NHIDCL. He also said two people have so far died in landslides caused by unscrupulous disposal of soil and unsystematic construction of highways by the construction company.

    YEJM activist Lalrinfela Khiangte says that the project had mostly affected the Situal, Serchhip, and Hnahthial districts. “The spoiled soil deposited along the banks of the river has destroyed the crops grown here and made the land unfit for agricultural use,” she said.

    Meanwhile, the Mizoram Pollution Control Board issued a show cause notice to the NHIDCL after earth spoils were dumped in a way that caused river pollution. The committee is still carrying out inspections, but most of them have reported violations.

    As mentioned by NHIDCL in its official website, the widening work of NH-54 is being executed in a joint venture by Gawar Pvt Ltd and SCCPL and was scheduled to be completed by July 2023. Whereas the expansion of NH-6 is executed by GVV Constructions and NG Projects and the project was scheduled to be completed by January 2022.

    The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways had set the target to complete the work on NH102B by August 2023. The work on NH302 was to be completed by 30 December 2022, the revised date of completion is 31 December 2024. 

    2
    Fact Sheet

    Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

    Opposition against environmental degradation

    Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

    Complaint against procedural violations

    Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

    Region Classification

    Urban and Rural

    Type of Land

    Common and Private

    Forest and Non-Forest

    What was the action taken by the police?

    How many people did the police detain or arrest?

    What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

    Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

    If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

    If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

    Legislation under which the accused was charged

    Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

    In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

    Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

    Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

    Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

    Status of Project

    Project underway despite protests

    Original Project Deadline

    Whether the Project has been Delayed

    Yes

    Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

    Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Water bodies

    Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

    Source/Reference

    <https://www.projectsmonitor.com/daily-wire/nhidcl-floats-tender-for-upgradation-of-pawlrang-rulchawm-section-in-mizoram/> <https://nhidcl.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/NHIDCL-Project-Status-as-on-31.01.2024-for-uploading-on-Portal.pdf>

    Total investment involved (in Crores):

    14900

    Type of investment:

    Cost of Project

    Year of Estimation

    2022

    Page Number In Investment Document:

    1

    Has the Conflict Ended?

    No

    When did it end?

    Why did the conflict end?

    East Street Journal Asia