Madhya Pradesh
Panna district
,
Silon
,
Chhatarpur
Published :
Jul 2017
|
Updated :
UP, MP Governments Go Ahead with Ken Betwa Inter-linking Project Despite Opposition
Reported by
Arpit Deshmukh
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
1000
People affected
2002
Year started
5026
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
1000
People Affected
2002
Year started
5026
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The KenBetwa Project is an ambitious irrigation project proposed in 1982 by the Centre to link the Ken and Betwa rivers flowing through Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. The government claims the project would benefit 13 lakh families by meeting their irrigation, drinking water and electricity needs in the droughtprone areas of the two states. The project, comprising a 231kilometrelong canal between the two rivers as well as two reservoirs, requires the felling of more than 1.8 million trees, besides submerging most of the 6,400 hectares of forestland in and around Panna Tiger Reserve. The project will also submerge nearly 5,026 hectares of private and common land and will displace about 1,000 families inside and outside the reserve, according to a feasibility report by the National Water Development Authority (NWDA). While many environmentalists have demanded scrapping of the project, most affected villagers are demanding fair compensation to the families that will be displaced. Kamlesh Yadav from Palkohan village said in a news report, We do not know what this project is about. We came only because a jeep came to our village, saying we were going to be displaced and that we should attend the public hearing. We have come to demand a fair compensation for displacement, because we know we cant stop the government from throwing us out. Activists allege that the villagers were not provided enough information on the project before the public hearing. In fact, they say that they were not aware of any public hearing or notices issued to the village panchayat. Many were not aware of the nature of the project and were under the impression that it was a dam. Despite the lack of information and misinformation, most villagers pleaded only for fair compensation rather than raising environmental concerns because many allegedly face harassment by forest officials inside the tiger reserve and want to be relocated, a report says. According to the NWDA, the compensation and rehabilitation plan will be assessed as per the LARR Act, 2013. The government is yet to discuss the compensation amount with the affected villagers. Meanwhile, the project has been stalled due to opposition from environmentalists over its massive impact on forest, wildlife and environment. LCW spoke to Himanshu Thakkar from the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People on October 11, 2019. He said that the KenBetwa project does not have final forest clearance. Additionally, there is no bilateral agreement between Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh on the interlinking project. In March 2020, the Centre started work on establishing an exclusive body to implement projects for linking rivers that are generally stalled due to lack of consensus among states. According to a report, the chief ministers of Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh will sign an agreement on March 22, 2021, to implement the KenBetwa Project.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for promised compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

28000

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

National Water Development Agency, Ministry of Water Resources, Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Panna Parivartan Evam Vikas Manch, South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Arpit Deshmukh
Show more work
Latest updates
Surendranagar
Gujarat

Protests against solar power plant in Dhrangadhra’s Moti Malvan village in Gujarat

Tiruvannamalai
Tamil Nadu

Farmers protest new SIPCOT industrial complex project in Tamil Nadu's Thiruvannamalai

Visakhapatnam
Andhra Pradesh

Farmers demand compensation for land diverted for thermal power plant in Vishakhapatnam

Nainital
Uttarakhand

6 killed in Haldwani amid protest over demolition of mosque and madrasa

Pune
Maharashtra

Pune residents protest felling of trees for transit corridor, fear groundwater contamination

North Delhi
Delhi

DDA razes down encroachments near Azadpur Mandi in Delhi, 250 families rendered homeless

North West Delhi
Delhi

Residents of Delhi's Shakur Basti continue to live in fear of demolition

Jalgaon
Maharashtra

Farmers in Maharashtra's Jalgaon allege 1100 acres fraudulently acquired by solar power companies

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for promised compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us