Madhya Pradesh
,
Pachmarhi
,
Narmadapuram
Published :
Sep 2024
|
Updated :
Pachmarhi airstrip expansion taken up sans environmental clearances, NGT halts project
Reported by
Avani Mishra
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2023
Year started
2
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2023
Year started
2
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In December 2023, captain (retd) Brajesh Kumar Bharadwaj from Chhindwara raised concerns when he noticed that the existing 1,200-metre airstrip in Pachmarhi, built during the British era, was being expanded by the public works department (PWD) to 1,800 metres, defying the Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972, and ESZ notification.

The PWD had floated a tender for over Rs 9.19 crore for the construction of the airstrip at Pachmarhi. The work was granted to Sarathi Constructions on 12 May 2022 for the commercial expansion of the airstrip.

The expansion work was being carried out in the ecologically fragile Pachmarhi, which is a UNESCO-designated biosphere reserve. The site fell within 200 metres of the protected area boundary of the Satpura Tiger Reserve and within the notified Eco-Sensitive Zone of Pachmarhi Hills. 

Citing these violations, Bharadwaj lodged complaints with the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA), PCCF (Wildlife), field director of Satpura Tiger Reserve (STR), Airports Authority of India (AAI) and DGCA. He alleged, "The public works department (PWD) has deployed heavy machinery for digging a stretch and hilly slopes. Many trees were also felled. The chopped trees have been hidden in nearby shrubs."

According to Bharadwaj, planes will fly over the core area during take-off, landings, diversions etc, thus violating Wildlife Protection Act (WLPA), 1972. “New airstrips with fuel bunkering and refuelling require mandatory clearances,” said Bharadwaj.

Soon after his complaint, a report was sought from the PWD, leading to the stoppage of work.

According to a Times of India report, the airstrip was being extended under the regional connectivity scheme (RCS), and the idea was to allow VIP planes.

Later, Bharadwaj petitioned the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which initiated an inquiry into the matter. On 8 August 2024, the NGT ordered the suspension of the airstrip expansion project in Pachmarhi until all statutory permissions, including those for Environmental Sensitive Zones (ESZ), wildlife, and environmental clearances, are obtained.

The NGT noted that the expansion was being carried out without statutory permissions viz. Environment Clearance, Wildlife Clearance, approval of National Tiger Conservation Authority and was violative of several provisions of the Eco-Sensitive Zone notification. It also issued notices to key authorities in connection with the controversial airstrip expansion project in Pachmarhi.

An expert committee has been constituted by the NGT consisting of five members representing MoEFCC, CPCB, District Narmadapuram, SPCB and SEIAA (MP) which, inter alia, recommended alternate sites be explored and emphasised the need for a clearance from National Board for Wildlife Clearance. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing, Other environmental services, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Director General of Forest, Government of India, MP State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (MPSEIAA), Bhopal, Chief Wildlife Warden, Government of Madhya Pradesh, National Tiger Conservation Authority, Principal Secretary, Civil aviation, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Chief Conservator of Forest and Field director, Satpura Tiger Reserve, Narmadapuram and Member Secretary, State Pollution Control Board, Bhopal

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Avani Mishra
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing, Other environmental services, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us