Madhya Pradesh
Chirmikheda, Diken and Khatikheda
,
Bhagwanpura
,
Neemuch
Published :
Aug 2023
|
Updated :
Nomadic communities driven to abject poverty by the Welspun Solar MP Project
Reported by
Soumya Pandey
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
70
People affected
Year started
305
Land area affected
Households affected
70
People Affected
Year started
305
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In 2014, Narendra Modi inaugurated one of Indias largest solar power plants in the Neemuch district of Madhya Pradesh. Operated by Welspun Energy Limited (WEL), the 151 MW project was expected to supply power to 6.24 lakh homes in the state. For the local population however, the plant has pushed them towards poverty in the absence of compensation for acquired land and a failure to follow through on the promise of increased employment for the locals at the plant. 

A campaign raising concerns around land rights of these villagers with respect to the land acquisition for the Welspun Solar Plant was met with a crackdown on the 15 villagers who launched the campaign in the form of false charges of theft and 40 days in jail.

Villagers, mostly consisting of Adivasi communities of Gurjars and Bhils, whose land has been acquired under the project have been made to wait for the compensation despite proof of land ownership documents. Moreover, the tribal communities of the area that were dependent on this land to graze their cattle and grow their crops have also been left in a lurch in the absence of any compensatory land. 

While the plant authorities had promised increased employment for the local populations, most of the workers on the plant have been brought from outside. The plant authorities and government officials have failed in fulfilling promises made to the locals.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for employment

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

They demand that arrears of the salary of those who worked on the project be paid as soon as possible.

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

15

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Undergoing trial

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Don't know

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 378, 379

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1100

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

15

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Undergoing trial

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Don't know

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Section 378, 379

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Soumya Pandey

Soumya is currently pursuing her Master’s in Development at Azim Premji University, Bengaluru. She graduated in Social Sciences from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad, and has previously worked with TSWREIS (Telangana Social Welfare Residential Schools), the INBI Foundation and the MTV Staying Alive Foundation. Her research interests include climate change, natural resource governance, reproductive health and neoliberal healthcare systems.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for employment

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us