Delhi
Priyanka Gandhi Camp
,
Vasant Vihar
,
South West Delhi
Published :
Jul 2023
|
Updated :
National Disaster Response Force evicts over 70 families in Vasant Vihar, Delhi
Reported by
Asmi Sharma
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
69
Households affected
People affected
2023
Year started
1
Land area affected
69
Households affected
People Affected
2023
Year started
1
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

On May 19, 2023, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs issued demolition notices to the residents of Priyanka Gandhi Camp, a jhuggi jhopri basti located in the affluent area of Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. The notices cited the houses were illegally built on land allotted to the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) for their Delhi headquarters.

In response, the Priyanka Gandhi Camp Adhikar Manch filed a writ in the Delhi High Court, seeking a stay on the demolitions and rehabilitation under the 2015 DUSIB Policy.

The residents of Priyanka Camp claim they have been living there for the past three decades and are included in the additional list of 82 bastis, which was released as a supplement to the previous 675 JJ basti list. And therefore were eligible for rehabilitation by the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB).

The matter was heard on May 30, 2023, during which the NDRF claimed that they were allotted the land in January 2020 for constructing their headquarters.

The counsel for DUSIB acknowledged that Priyanka Camp was indeed listed in the additional 82 JJ basti list. However, during the proceeding, they arbitrarily claimed that the residents of Priyanka Camp are not entitled to the same rights under the 2015 policy as those listed in the 675 JJ basti list.

The Delhi High Court extended the demolition date from June 2, 2023, to June 15, 2023. The court directed DUSIB to provide temporary accommodation in shelters to the residents and instructed them to work with the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to determine the eligibility of the residents under the 2015 DUSIB Policy.

However, following the court proceedings in May 2023, the additional list of 82 notified bastis has now been withdrawn and removed from the DUSIB website.

According to Nirmal Gorana, the convenor of the Mazdoor Awaas Sangharsh Samiti, police and NDRF, National Disaster Management and Restoration Centre (NDMRC), and Central Reserve Police Force personnel arrived at Priyanka Gandhi Camp on 15 June intimating residents to clear their belongings and vacate the premises.

Residents claimed the demolition team arrived as early as 3 AM. They were swiftly removed from the premises by 6 AM, and the area was completely cordoned off, preventing everyone from accessing the site during the demolitions.

Residents attempting to retrieve their belongings were unable to do so. Confrontations between the police and activists led to the detention of three people. However, they were released on the same day.

Nirmal Gorana further added that the affected residents have been offered temporary accommodation, but they are unwilling to relocate to shelters located on the outskirts of the city. Gorana pointed out that many of the residents have dispersed throughout Delhi, seeking refuge with relatives or renting houses in the nearby areas. He strongly emphasised that the recent demolitions in Priyanka Gandhi Camp are indicative of a concerning trend in Delhi, characterised by a rise in demolitions and a lack of proper rehabilitation measures.

The recent demolition at Priyanka Gandhi Camp has left nearly 500 individuals homeless. Although the petition in the High Court was filed on behalf of 69 families, an official statement by the Inspector General of NDRF confirmed that 97 settlements were demolished, and 1.6 acres of land were recovered.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

3

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

No

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, National Disaster Response Force, Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, Delhi Development Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

3

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Released from detention

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

No

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Asmi Sharma

Asmi is a researcher based out of New Delhi. She holds a Bachelor's degree in History from Ramjas College and a Master's degree in Development Studies from Azim Premji University. She has been working with various people’s movements for the past five years including the National Campaign for Peoples' Right to Information and Jan Sarokar. Her areas of interest include transparency, accountability, participatory governance, access to social justice, rights and entitlements.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us