Goa
,
Maxem, Canacona tehsil
,
South Goa
Published :
Jun 2017
|
Updated :
Landfilling on Maxem Riverbank in South Goa Floods Fisherfolk' Homes
Reported by
Nihar Gokhale
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
50
Households affected
240
People affected
2000
Year started
2
Land area affected
50
Households affected
240
People Affected
2000
Year started
2
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Several fisherfolk living in Maxem (also spelled Mashem) village in South Goa have been opposing road construction work in their area. The road is a bypass to the National Highway-66 (old NH17) and includes a small bridge over the Maxem river and a long embankment along the river bank. The latter entailed landfilling on the banks up to three metres in width and five metres in height. The landfilling took place as early as 2000, and the fisherfolk have been fighting against it with the Public Works Department (PWD) ever since.
Many fisherfolk had houses built along the banks, where a huge mud wall has now been built, cutting off their access to the river. The river is not far from the sea, as a result of which the houses have become flood-prone as there is no way for rainwater to drain into the river.
The PWD had initially told the fisherfolk that the embankments were temporary. But the project came to a standstill within a year, and the PWD eventually never removed the embankments. Many of the houses were partially submerged in the infamous Canacona floods of 2009.
The project was restarted in 2016. A year earlier, in 2015, the fisherfolk wrote letters to the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA) alleging that no permission was taken for the landfilling under the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification, 2011, even though the area is a tidally influenced estuary close to the sea. The PWD then applied for CRZ clearance. An expert member of GCZMA submitted in a field inspection report in September 2015 that the embankment was a "cause of concern" as it was close to the high tide line and recommended further studies to establish its impact. No further studies were carried out, and the GCZMA reportedly accorded approval without deliberating it in any other meeting.
The fisherfolk report that local PWD officials made verbal promises in 2017 that the filling would be removed and a road would be built on stilts. The fisherfolk agreed to the proposal as it resolved their problems of river access, rainwater drainage and ventilation. But there was no official word on this change in the plan even as work on the road progressed.
As the fisherfolk continued to protest, the construction was shelved, but work resumed in 2018. In April 2019, the GCZMA expert committee recommended desilting (desilting is the removal of fine silt and sediment) of river to help rejuvenate the water body. The bridge on Maxem was supposed to be reopened in July 2019. However, the same month, a side wall of the bridge collapsed. Residents claimed that they had warned the PWD about this possibility but were ignored. They then approached the Bombay High Court at Goa over the construction of the Galgibaga and Maxem Creek bridge and road portion.
Currently, there is a corroded metal structure put in place as a temporary bridge. In August 2020, it was reported that the villagers are now demanding the construction of a footbridge.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

180

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority, Public Works Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Nihar Gokhale
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for better access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us