Maharashtra
Kese, Munde, Padali, Gote and Supane villages
,
Varunji
,
Satara
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
Maharashtra Farmers Refuse to Allow Expansion of Karad Airport, Call it 'Non-viable'
Reported by
Prerna Chaurashe
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
25000
People affected
2011
Year started
1295
Land area affected
Households affected
25000
People Affected
2011
Year started
1295
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Karad airport in Satara district was constructed in the 1960s to facilitate the Koyna dam project. In 2011, then Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan proposed to expand the airstrip. The airstrip then could handle only small charter aircraft, so there was a need to expand into a proper runway to handle midsize aircraft. Farmers from six villages Varunji, Kese, Munde, Padali, Gote and Supane objected that it would take away their fertile land. According to the villagers, Karad is a small town with only 70,000 people. They argued that land acquisition would affect about 25,000 people who depend on agriculture. However, in June 2011, the district administration initiated land measurement for expansion of the airport near Varunji village, 1.5 kilometres from Karad. Some 450 farmers from Varunji and Kese villages demanded talks with the chief minister. The land on which a lift irrigation scheme was running was also proposed to be acquired. Farmer leader Ashok Thorat said this would affect the 3,200 acres of farmland irrigated by the lift irrigation scheme. The struggle against the project is being led by Shramik Mukti Dal. Its president, Bharat Patankar, argues that the expansion violates the National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy, 2007, which prohibits the acquisition of irrigated farmland. The farmers also claim that the project is being pushed with unnecessary urgency by sending a final notice for land acquisition without any earlier notice. The farmers have been staging protests against the project since 2011. In 2012, more than 4,000 farmers staged a protest asking for the plan to be scrapped. In December 2012, the issue was raised in the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly while the farmers led a sitin in front of the airport. The farmers staged another sitin in July 2019 in front of the district collector's office. They announced that they would continue to protest until the project was cancelled. In August, 2019, the farmers held another protest at the airport gate and demanded information on the use of the airport since 2011. However, they ended their protest in September 2019 after 50 days in the hope that the project would be scrapped. The same month, Stay Grounded, an international network supporting the struggle, sent an open letter to the prime minister and the Satara district collector requesting the government to heed the farmers' demands. The letter requested the authorities to "prioritise their rural livelihood and safety over the development of a nonviable infrastructure that serves particular political interests, involves safety risks and is noncompliant with policy".

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to scrap the expansion project

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

85.46

Type of investment:

Investment Made

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Maharashtra Airport Development Corporation, Airports Authority of India

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Shramik Mukti Dal (Dr. Bharat Patankar), Prithviraj Chavan (ex CM)

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Prerna Chaurashe


Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us