Delhi
,
Gyaspur Basti, Sarai Kale Khan, Nizamudin East
,
South East Delhi
Published :
Feb 2023
|
Updated :
Hundreds of Households in Gyaspur Basti Demolished for Bamboo Themed Recreational Park
Reported by
Asmi Sharma
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
100
Households affected
459
People affected
2022
Year started
1
Land area affected
100
Households affected
459
People Affected
2022
Year started
1
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Between June and August 2022, over 100 families of Gyaspur Basti were evicted from their homes in a series of demolition drives carried out by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). According to the DDA, the demolitions were carried out in areas identified for eco-restoration plantation as a part of the restoration and rejuvenation of the Yamuna River floodplains in compliance with multiple the National Green Tribunal orders.

Situated in Sarai Kale Khan, Nizamuddin East - Gyaspur Basti was a settlement of two clusters of approximately 100 low-income households. Most residents in the basti belonged to Schedule Caste Communities and had migrated to Delhi from Uttar Pradesh in search of employment opportunities. Community members claimed they have been residing in the area since 1995.

On 27 June 2022, DDA officials with Delhi Police arrived at Gyaspur and demolished 20-30 structures after having only orally informed residents about the demolition a week prior. Residents immediately filed a plea in Delhi High Court to halt further demolitions. And also sought directions for the concerned agencies - DDA and Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) to follow the established procedures and rules laid down in Delhi's 2015 slum rehabilitation policy. Submitting documents to show they had been residing in the area before 2006, the petitioners cited landmark judgements on slum evictions like Sudama Singh and Others vs. Government of India and Ajay Maken and Others vs. Union of India in their application to the court. The DDA on its part had submitted google earth images of the area dating back to 2004, 2006 and 2022 to show that the clusters have not existed since the past two decades.

A stay order was granted by Delhi High Court to maintain status quo till 11 July 2022. But DDA officials returned to the basti on 6 July 2022 and demolished more houses. On 4 August, 2022, the Delhi High Court vacated its initial stay order. The reasoning offered by the court was that since the Gyaspur basti was not included in any notified lists of Jhuggi Jhopri clusters, its residents could not claim protection under the landmark judgements. But the court also said that the DDA and Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) should provide alternate shelter arrangements for the residents of the basti.

On 5 August 2022, DDA put up eviction notices informing residents of Gyaspur that the basti would be demolished and that provisions for accommodation had been made in Shelter Homes run by DUSIB in Sector 1, Dwarka - nearly 27 kilometres away. 
 
Demolitions were carried out in Gyaspur on 8 August 2022, and according to the DDA website 2 acres of land have been reclaimed. This land is now part of an area of 10 hectares of the Yamuna floodplain that is being developed as a bamboo theme recreational park titled project ‘Baansera’ and was inaugurated by the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, Mr Vinod Kumar Saxena on 9 August 2022. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

Judgement

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

August 2022

Why did the conflict end?

After serving notice on 5 August 2022, DDA officials demolished residences in Gyaspur Basti on 8 August 2022. More than 100 dwellings were demolished according to media reports. Temporary location has been provided to those displaced in Shelter Homes run by DUSIB in Dwarka Sector 1, nearly 27 kilometers away from where the residents were residing.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Delhi Development Authority, Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board, Delhi Police

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Residents of Gyaspur

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Asmi Sharma

Asmi is a researcher based out of New Delhi. She holds a Bachelor's degree in History from Ramjas College and a Master's degree in Development Studies from Azim Premji University. She has been working with various people’s movements for the past five years including the National Campaign for Peoples' Right to Information and Jan Sarokar. Her areas of interest include transparency, accountability, participatory governance, access to social justice, rights and entitlements.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

Judgement

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us