West Bengal
Keshabpur and Manohar villages
,
Barjora
,
Bankura
Published :
Sep 2020
|
Updated :
Explosions from Bengal's Barjora Coal Mine Crack Houses, Residents Demand Rehabilitation, Compensation
Reported by
Mitali Biswas
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
1296
People affected
2015
Year started
260
Land area affected
Households affected
1296
People Affected
2015
Year started
260
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Barjora (North) Coal Mine in Bankura district is spread over 700 acres across the villages of Manohar, Baguli, Ghutghoria, Sitarampur, Saharjora, Tikargram and Baraphukhuria. Owned by Damodar Valley Corporation and Eastern Mineral and Trading Agency till 2006, the mine was ordered to be shut down by the Supreme Court in 2014, along with 203 other coal blocks in the country. In 2015, West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited (WBPDCL) bought ownership rights for the mine in an open bid auction. Montecarlo Barjora Mining Private Limited later procured rights to extract coal from the mine. The estimated cost of mining was INR 918.58 crore, and 228 hectares of land were leased for the same. Residents of Keshabpur and Manohar villages have complained of cracks in their houses due to blasts from mining operations. "More than 150 houses in our village have cracks, and all of them start shaking violently during the explosions. The tiles start falling down from the roofs so we have to wait outside the house during the blasts. Even our crops have been destroyed by the collierys polluted water. Our lives and environment are under threat. When we protested against WBPDCL & Montecarlo, they filed cases against 13 of us six men and seven women. Some of the women are older than 60, Baren Bauri, a resident of Manohar village, informed LCW. Suman Bhaduri, a resident of Keshabpur village, added, Our village adjoins the colliery, but it does not fall within the blast radius. We have filed complaints with the Block Development Officer (BDO), panchayat and higher authorities but all in vain. Cases have been slapped on five persons, including me. None of the companys promises, including 500 days wages to the affected people, road repair work and other infrastructure development, have been fulfilled. The agrarian labourers in our village are without livelihood.  BDO Bhaskar Roy refused to speak to LCW when questioned about the villagers allegations. However, WBPDCLs Land Officer Pradeep Roy told LCW that they have received reports of cracks appearing on houses and that subsequent investigation is underway. He said that the company generally blasts 50 metres away from settlements and since these villages are outside the blast radius, there is no question of rehabilitation. He, however, mentioned that when the mine is fully operational, the agrarian labourers in the area will be employed and some of the companys CSR funds would be allocated for the development of the village. According to the All India Agriculture Workers Union, only 262 people of the 600 affected by mining have received 500 days wages as promised. These 600 people also include agricultural labourers from nearby villages, some of whom do not own land or houses in Keshabpur and Manohar villages.    In protest, the Union members organised rallies and gheraoed the district magistrate's office on August 1, 2019. They went on an indefinite hunger strike in January 2020 demanding rehabilitation, employment and compensation for the agrarian workers. The Union called off the strike after 10 days when the BDO and local police promised to look into the matter.  Meanwhile, many of the local people who collect coal from abandoned areas of the mine to sell in their local markets get injured in the process. In January 2020, three people, including two women, died in Baguli village while collecting coal as the mine caved in when they were inside.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for promised compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised jobs

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

918

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

West Bengal Power Development Corporation Limited (WBPDCL)

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Montecarlo Barjora Mining Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Mitali Biswas

Mitali has previously worked as a freelance journalist for Doordarshan. She has directed and produced documentaries themed on sexual violence against women and the peasant movement at Bhangar in West Bengal. She has also co-directed SD, an investigative biography on slain Naxalite leader Saroj Datta. She is currently in the editorial board of Protibidhan, a Bengali magazine dedicated to women’s movements.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for promised compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us