Madhya Pradesh
,
Chutka
,
Mandla
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
Chutka Nuclear Power Project in Madhya Pradesh Gets Clearance Without Community Consent
Reported by
Gourav Jaiswal
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
70000
People affected
2009
Year started
407
Land area affected
Households affected
70000
People Affected
2009
Year started
407
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Nuclear Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Nuclear Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In 2009, the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited decided to establish a 1,400megawatt nuclear power plant in Chutka village in Mandla district. Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Company Limited (MPPGCL) is the nodal agency to execute the project. After the idea for the power plant was proposed, the government allotted 16.5 hectares of land to the power company. The project is estimated to displace 70,000 people in 54 villages in the district. The plant is likely to consume 7,25,76,000 cu.m. of water every year from the reservoir, which will reduce the total water flow of the Narmada river. The people who are likely to be displaced were earlier affected and rehabilitated in Mandla by the Bargi Dam project. Mandla district is covered under the Fifth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, where land cannot be acquired without the consent of the gram sabha. The land was allotted to MPPGCL without the consent of the residents or the gram sabha, violating the Forest Rights Act. Village assemblies of Patha, Kundla and Tatighat rejected the government's proposal to set up the nuclear plant, and they also refused the rehabilitation plan to shift them to Potla village. Despite the opposition, in 2015, the state government deposited money into the bank accounts of about 450 projectaffected families. In May 2017, the power plant was granted forest clearance for diversion of 119.46 hectares of forestland by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change. In September 2018, when the affected people refused to share their Aadhar details with MPPGCL for compensation as they did not want to part with their land, the company obtained the information through the banks and deposited the compensation amount directly in their accounts. Meanwhile, the residents of the affected villages have been complaining of contaminated water and environmental pollution. Activist Medha Patkar, who is lending her voice to the cause, is quoted in a news report as saying, "Under the Fifth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, the governor has the power to annul any law that goes against tribal interests; the government is doing the opposite." She cited a Supreme Court ruling in the case of the Omkareshwar Dam oustees to argue that "payment of compensation does not mean the affected people have accepted the terms". With the Lok Sabha polls around the corner in 2019, the movement against the power plant became an election issue. People put up posters on trees stating, 'Vote only for the party that cancels the power plant.' In September 2019, labourers belonging to the plant developers came to the villages unannounced and started digging the ground. The residents forced the labourers to flee. The struggle against the plant has continued. In February 2020, the Chutka Parmanu Sangarsh Samiti circulated an appeal against the plant stating their grievances. Earlier, the members of representing organisations such as the Jal, Jangal, Jameen and Jeevan met with MP Governor Lalji Tandon demanding cancellation of the project.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest and Non-Forest, Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

16550

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board; Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited, Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Nuclear Power Corporation of India, Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Chutka Parmanu Sangarsh Samiti, Gondwana Gantantra Party, Communist Party of India, Shiksha Adhikar Manch Bhopal, All India Revolutionary Students Organisation, Revolutionary Youth Federation of India, Madhya Pradesh Mahila Manch, Womens Rights Network, Chutka Virodhi Sangharsh Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Gourav Jaiswal
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us