Chhattisgarh
Chalkipara, Peddapara, Akash Nagar, Timinar and Nerli villages
,
Bacheli Township
,
Dantewada
Published :
Jan 2017
|
Updated :
Gond Tribespeople Dead Against Expansion of Bailadila Deposit-10 Iron Mine in Chhattisgarh
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2014
Year started
309
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2014
Year started
309
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Iron Ore Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Iron Ore Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Bailadila range is the hub of iron ore mining in Chhattisgarh. Currently, there are 14 identified iron ore deposits, of which one is Deposit10 located in the Bacheli Complex in Dantewada district. The National Mineral Development Corporation Limited (NMDC) operates this mine spread over an area of 309.34 hectares.  In 2014, NDMC, Indias largest iron ore producer, proposed to increase the capacity of the mine from the existing 4.2 metric tonne per annum (MTPA) to 6 MTPA. Consequently, protests erupted after the residents of over 20 villages came together to oppose the expansion.  The villagers became fearful of the impact of the mining activities on their agricultural lands, water bodies and forest area, on which they depend for their livelihood. Reportedly, the region is also of religious significance to the majority Gond tribe living in the area.   The concerns of the villagers also stem from their experience of mining operations in the surrounding villages. They have alleged that layers of dust settle on agricultural fields and iron ore particles flow into the streams, which affects the soil productivity and contaminates the water bodies. They also claim that the agricultural land is turning infertile due to the red water problem. According to local reports, the tribespeople worry the expansion of the iron ore mine would worsen the water and air pollution and land degradation. The lease area demarcated for the expansion also falls under the Bailadila Reserve Forest, which endangers the rich biodiversity of the region.  In December 2015, the villagers united under the banner of Sanyukt Panchayat Jan Sangharsh Samiti to protest against the public hearing that was scheduled to be organised by the nodal office of the Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board (CECB). A local newspaper reported that the villagers did not receive any communication about the public hearing and that it was being organised at a considerable distance from the affected villages to prevent largescale participation. Following this, the Chhattisgarh Bachao Andolan issued a letter demanding cancellation of the public hearing citing discrepancies and misinformation in the EIA report for the proposed expansion. Finally on December 29, the district collector issued a notice to cancel the meeting after continued protests.  On November 15, 2016, the administration once again organised a public hearing for the project. This time too, the villagers claimed that they did not get any prior information about the hearing and identified procedural discrepancies in violation of the PESA Act, 1996. They reiterated their concerns about the expansion plan and persistent problems related to pollution and the impact on lands and livelihoods.  Subsequently, the village representatives submitted a petition to the CECB and held a meeting with the district collector on November 16 to voice their discontent and demand action. Amidst the opposition, the NMDC published the final Environmental Impact Assessment report in February 2017. According to the report, an action plan was formulated based on the issues raised during the public hearing held in November 2016.  The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change granted environmental clearance to the project on July 7, 2017. In December 2019, the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy extended the mining lease of four deposits, including Deposit10, for another 20 years. The residents of different villages in the Bailadila range, meanwhile, continue to protest.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

385.44

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

State Government of Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Chhattisgarh Bachao Andolan, Sanyukt Panchayat Jan Sangharsh Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey


Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us