Assam
Kheroni
,
Hawaipur
,
Karbi Anglong
Published :
May 2024
|
Updated :
10,000 people face eviction from tribal council land in Assam's Karbi Anglong
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
2086
Households affected
10000
People affected
2024
Year started
2908
Land area affected
2086
Households affected
10000
People Affected
2024
Year started
2908
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Encroachment by Non-Right Holders (Other than Caste-based)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In a move that has sparked tensions between the Karbi tribe and Hindi-speaking communities in Assam's Karbi Anglong areas, the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council (KAAC) has served eviction notices to approximately 10,000 people accused of illegally settling on reserved grazing lands in the Sixth Scheduled districts of Karbi Anglong and West Karbi Anglong.
 
At the centre of contention are the Village Grazing Reserve (VGR) and Professional Grazing Reserve (PGR) lands, covering 7,184.7 acres. While the Karbi community calls for the eviction of illegal settlers from PGR and VGR lands to safeguard their lands and identity, Hindi-speaking communities demand the de-reservation of these grazing lands that will allow them to own legal titles.
 
The Hindi-speaking communities in Karbi Anglong primarily comprise the Nonias, a predominantly farming community from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
 
On 17 January 2024, Rachnatmak Nonia Sanyukta Sangh (RNSS), an RSS-backed organisation representing the Hindi-speaking community, submitted a memorandum to President Droupadi Murmu requesting the legalisation of their settlements on these grazing reserves.
 
Dharmendra Chauhan, national joint secretary of RNSS, told the media, "Our people have been in possession of PGR and VGR land for many decades."
 
The memorandum incited protests from Karbi students and civil society organisations such as the Karbi Students' Association, Karbi Nimso Chingthur Asong, and Autonomous State Demand Committee Youth Front, demanding the eviction of illegal encroachers from PGR and VGR lands in Hawaipur (West Karbi Anglong district) and Phuloni (Karbi Anglong district). They view the settlers as illegal occupants threatening Karbi lands and identity. 
 
"No one has been legally allotted land on these grazing lands, but settlers have been living there illegally. This is a Sixth Schedule land, and we have our own separate land rights. It is not a recent issue, but it has been going on for about a decade now," Karbi Students Association president Mirjeng Kro told The Indian Express.
 
On 15 February 2024, protests turned violent as members of the Hindi-speaking community allegedly assaulted some Karbi protesters. The scuffle, which triggered a near-shutdown in major towns, reportedly resulted in injuries to 11 persons and the arrest of 17 people.
 
Chandra Kanta Terang, President of the Autonomous State Demand Committee, was quoted as saying, "The Karbis were beaten up in their own home while trying to protect our ancestral land from outsiders."
 
In response to the protests, the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council (KAAC), headed by Chief Executive Member Tuliram Ronghang, announced plans for eviction on 20 February 2024.
 
The KAAC draws its authority from the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, which grants them decision-making rights within their jurisdiction.
 
The KAAC has defended its decision to evict by citing a controversial 2011 Supreme Court order directing the public authorities to evict illegal occupants from grazing lands and restore them for public use.
 
Affected residents, who claim to have lived on the land for decades, expressed shock at the eviction notices despite prior assurances from the BJP state government. They possess documents proving residency; some are even included in the National Register of Citizens.

While the Assam government approved de-reservation proposals for other districts in 2023, the demand for "de-reservation" appears problematic due to Karbi Anglong's designation as an autonomous area, granted under the Sixth Schedule in 1976.

The situation is also linked with the political dynamics in Assam. While the ruling party BJP electoral support from both Karbi and Nonia communities, tribal communities of Assam reportedly remain wary of the party's stance toward Hindi-speaking community settled in the area.
 
Noting the rising population of Hindi speakers in Assam over the past decade, Holiram Terang, a veteran Karbi political figure, alleged: "After the BJP government came to power in Centre and state, some of these people have become very aggressive, socially and culturally. I won't be surprised if the RSS is pushing them to demand land rights."
 
Amid the threat of eviction looming over 2,086 families, the KAAC remains firm on its decision, declaring that the eviction targets all illegal encroachers, regardless of ethnic identity as per the Supreme Court's order.
 
"We will not differentiate between any community. There are Karbis, Boros, Tiwas, Biharis, Bengalis, Nepalis – all kinds of communities are encroaching on these lands, and we will do the evictions as per the SC order," Ronghang stated.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

17

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Currently under arrest

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code

Sections 341/147/143/294/120B/153A and 325/307/506/427

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

A case (No. 12/2024) has been registered against 17 arrested under sections 341/147/143/294/120B/153A 325/307/506/427 of the IPC. As on 16 February 2024, the 17 persons were still under arrest.

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Grazing, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council; District Administration of Karbi Anglong and West Karbi Anglong; Revenue & Disaster Management Department, Assam

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Rachnatmak Nonia Sanyukta Sangh, Karbi Students' Association, Karbi Nimso Chingthur Asong, Autonomous State Demand Committee Youth Front

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

17

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Currently under arrest

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code

Sections 341/147/143/294/120B/153A and 325/307/506/427

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Grazing, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us