In August 2022, 13 revenue villages next to Parandur village in Kancheepuram district of Tamil Nadu was announced as the site for a greenfield airport. This airport was proposed as the second international airport that would supplement the existing one in Chennai to meet the surplus passenger traffic.
Soon after the site for airport was announced residents of affected villages, are completely dependent on the land for their livelihood, felt scared about losing their agricultural lands. Protests began in 2022 across villages in Walajabad Block and has continued since. In July 2024, their protest completed two years (731 days).
Even as the state government offered three and a half times the market value of the land as compensation, the community rejected it as they would lose their livelihoods if their lands were acquired from them. Villagers have been demanding the government to scrap the project. They have been urging the government to shift the project to another site such as Pannur, where fewer people rely on agricultural subsistence and there are less number of water bodies.
On 2 October 22022, a Gram Sabha resolution was passed by residents of affected villages expressing their opposition to the project. This was followed by a protest march towards the Tamil Nadu Secretariat with the demand that an alternative site be found for the project.
In November 2023, the Department of Industries, Investment Promotion and Commerce released the G.O. for land acquisition of 5746.18 acres at the chosen Parandur site, including 1,917.17 acres (35%) of commons (Poramboke) including (27%) water bodies, 3,500 acres of agricultural land (47% agricultural wetland, 17% agricultural dry land). It also includes 400 acres for the axillary infrastructure facilities, resettlements, approach roads, etc. The estimate of the project is Rs 32,705 crore for all four phases with additional infrastructure expenses that include Rs 11,000 crore Metrorail from Chennai to Parandur.
According to the government document shared under RTI, 13,000 people are likely to be impacted due to the project, with 6,356 of them from seven village requiring resettlement. It is important to note that the feasibility report estimates the number of households at 1,005.
Environmentalists believe that the project will have a long-lasting ecological impact as 36,000 trees are expected to be cut and water bodies, including 12 lakes, over 20 ponds, several small irrigating tanks and two major canals could be impacted due to construction activities. The canals are interconnected with Palar or Coocum rivers and lakes, jointly acting as the largest water resource for the Chennai Metropolitan City.
On 26 February 2024, at least 94 farmers who staged a protest against land acquisition for the Parandur airport project in Tamil Nadu were detained by the police. The farmers raised slogans and demanded the state government to drop the project. Two days before the protest, the government had issued a notification to acquire land in Podavur village, which was one of the 13 villages selected for the project.
Villagers have also been requesting access to reports made on hydrography by IIT-Madras and Anna university, Techno-Economy by Louis Berger Consulting Pvt Ltd, regarding the proposed airport, but their request has been denied.
In Ekanapuram, nearly 2500 villagers have been protesting for two years in their own village next to a temple, with support from Nelvoy, Nagapattur, Parandur, Valathur. The villagers boycotted six Gram Sabha meetings and passed seven resolutions opposing the greenfield airport. Villagers from Ekanapuram and Nagapattur also boycotted the 2024 parliamentary election in protest against the land acquisition notice served in February 2024.
Komala from Nagapattur village of the Parandur panchayat union fears that they would be pushed to a new form of life where they have to earn for the water, food and even if one needs to defecate. In her village, farmers cultivate paddy as water is free. However, they fear that proposed project could pose serious threat to water security.
While sharing her memories of late son who built a house for them before he died, Alamelu N from the Ekanapuram village, asks, "If Stalin has all the rights, emotion to protest, file cases for former Chief Minister, DMK leader and his father M Karunanidhi for burial ground within Chennai in Marina beach, don’t we have rights to live and do agriculture in our lands? Our land is our rights and our identity."
Meanwhile, the state government passed a new law - Tamil Nadu Land Consolidation (for Special Projects) Act, 2023 - which intends to allow acquiring large parcels of land for special projects even if there are water bodies. The Steering Committee on the Greenfield Airport has granted the site clearance to the Project Proponent TIDCO in consultation with Airports Authority of India (AAI), Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) and Ministry of Defence/Indian Air Force as per GFA Policy. The Ministry of Defence also have granted NOC for site clearance.
Several political parties are expected to visit the protest site to the two years of ongoing protest in the Ekanapuram village. The government has floated notification in the newspaper for land acquisition in the outskirt villages.
While the current passenger flow is 20 million per year in Chennai Meenambakkam Airport, the greenfield airport targets 100 million peak passenger handling capacity per year by the year 2052.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand to cancel the project
Opposition against environmental degradation
Refusal to give up land for the project
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand for alternative location of the Project Protestor decided to move to Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh on the 700 day of protest Threat to nature based livelihood
Region Classification
Rural
Type of Land
Common and Private
Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)
What was the action taken by the police?
Preventive Detention
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
94
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Released from detention
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
No
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Indian Penal Code 1860
143, 341
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Project underway despite protests
Original Project Deadline
2029
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Agricultural land, Residential area, Water bodies, Grazing
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
No
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
32704.92
Type of investment:
Revised Investment
Year of Estimation
2024
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
No
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Controversial land acquisition by the government
Violation of environmental laws
Non-consultation with stakeholders
Incorrect estimation of compensation
Lack of legal protection over land rights
Legal Status:
Out of Court
Status of Case In Court
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
No
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Case Number
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Yes
Reported Details of the Violation:
People were detained under above mentioned law; when the people staged protest on the road opposing the new government office opened for land acquisition.
Date of Violation
February 25, 2024
Location of Violation
Ekanapuram village
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
District Revenue Department, Department of Industries, Department of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, Commissionerate of Land Administration
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Airports Authority of India (AAI), Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation (TIDCO)
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
Yes
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
No
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
Parandur Greenfield Airport project Resistance Group
What was the action taken by the police?
Preventive Detention
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
94
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Released from detention
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
No
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Indian Penal Code 1860
143, 341
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?