Delhi
,
Raisina Hills
,
New Delhi
Published :
Jan 2017
|
Updated :
Descendents of Farmers from Raisina Hills Demand Compensation under LARR Act
Reported by
Eleonora Fanari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
300
Households affected
24
People affected
1912
Year started
725
Land area affected
300
Households affected
24
People Affected
1912
Year started
725
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Township/Real Estate
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Township/Real Estate
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Commonly referred to as the seat of the Indian government, Raisina Hills -- housing the offices of the president, the prime minister and various Union ministries -- encompasses a vast stretch of land, initially carved out of seven villages. The descendants of those who had to relinquish their land for the development of the parliamentary complex, almost 100 years ago, have demanded due compensation for the land lost.
In 1912, the British government had acquired about 1,700 acres of this land from farmers residing in 150 villages to transfer the Capital of the country from Calcutta (now Kolkata) to Delhi. Some of the descendants of those farmers, now relocated in Haryana, are asking for compensation for the acquired land at the current market rate. While for some, as per the petition, their ancestors were bereft of any compensation, for others, their ancestors were not provided with adequate compensation, with certain landowners refusing to accept the amount.
In April 2015 and later in December 2016, two such descendants -- Mahavir from Raisina village and Sajjan Singh from Malcha village -- filed petitions at the Delhi high court claiming compensation. According to them, their ancestors were evicted under the erstwhile colonial Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Evoking the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, they have demanded that either full compensation be provided to them as per current market rates or the land in Raisina Hills be returned to them. The significant question underpinning the issue is whether the petitioner's claims hold ground, given that over a hundred years have passed since the initial acquisition process.
The petitioners had pinned their hopes on the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, according to which if "an award was made five years or more prior to the commencement of the Act itself, but physical possession of the land has not been taken by the government, or compensation has not been paid, the acquisition proceedings shall be deemed to have been lapsed" . However, in 2020, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court ruled that old compensation claims cannot be revived nor can "unending litigations" derail the progress of current projects. It cited the Raisina Hills issue as an example, stating that the compensation claims of the farmers were invalid. It explained that under the new law, land acquisition processes would only be considered lapsed if they had been initiated five years prior to January 1, 2014, when the new law came into being.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand to get back acquired land

Demand for compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of India, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Farmers of Raisina village

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Eleonora Fanari
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand to get back acquired land

Demand for compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us