Bihar
,
Baaghi
,
Aurangabad
Published :
Dec 2016
|
Updated :
Fearing Displacement, Bihar Village Opposes Thermal Power Plant, Refuses to Surrender Land
Reported by
Alok
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
384
People affected
2009
Year started
49
Land area affected
Households affected
384
People Affected
2009
Year started
49
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Thermal Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Thermal Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents and farmers have been fighting against displacement and demanding compensation for several years in relation to the construction of a thermal power plant of Nabinagar Power Generation Company (NPGC). The joint venture project has been developed by Bharatiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited (BRBCL) with NTPC having 74 per cent equity, and the Ministry of Railways holding the remaining 26 per cent. The plant was targeted to be commissioned in May 2017, with the other two units at an interval of six months each thereafter. About 2,789 acres of land has been awarded for the project out of the total 2,971 acres spread over eight villages in Nabinagar and Barun blocks in Aurangabad district.
In Baaghi Village, residents who were facing a threat of displacement submitted memorandums and applications to the district administration explaining that they did not want to give up their land for the power project. The residents were also peeved with the notice of the district magistrate, Kanwal Tanuj, on December 2, 2016, which stated that farmers not agreeing to or accepting compensation were hindering the power project. The magistrate ordered that the compensation of these farmers would be deposited in the court and legal action would be initiated against them for stalling a power project of national importance.
In 2018, it was reported that the Central Bureau of Investigation had filed a case of criminal conspiracy against Tanuj and C. Shiv Kumar, CEO of BRBCL. The charge cited the siphoning of funds that were to be distributed to the farmers for the process of land acquisition.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for promised compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

2017

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

7998

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

10

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Bihar Government

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Bharatiya Rail Bijlee Company Limited, National Thermal Power Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Nabinagar Power Generation Company Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Farmers, Visthapit Kishan Majdoor Kalyan Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Alok
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for promised compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

2017

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us