Meghalaya
,
Mallangkona
,
West Khasi Hills
Published :
Aug 2024
|
Updated :
Mallangkona residents oppose iron ore mining in West Khasi Hills
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2024
Year started
496
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2024
Year started
496
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Iron Ore Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Iron Ore Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of Mallangkona in the West Khasi Hills district of Meghalaya are opposing iron ore mining in the Chual Napram village. The villagers are concerned about the irreversible damage to the environment and water table as the drilling site is near the catchment area that supplies water to 24 villages.

On 23 May 2024, residents from 25 neighbouring villages, led by senior citizens and youth organisations, visited the site to inspect the large-scale drilling operations. The company's operators claimed to have permission for extracting iron ore, however, the villagers denied having any prior information or consultation regarding the drilling activity.

Upon enquiry by the villagers, the drillers failed to produce any permission but assured them that they would return with the necessary paperwork.

“When we contacted the prospectors, they said they had permission from the state and the mining department. However, other than one village headman, Madan Jira, who provided permission, the others were never consulted. This is a very serious matter and concerns the entire local population. We told them that we would not allow such a transgression in our area,” Enos G Momin, a local resident, told The Shillong Times.

On 27 May 2024, a large number of villagers gathered at the Mallangkona Outpost where the villagers demanded an immediate stop to all drilling activities.

The prospectors presented a composite mining license covering an area of 496 hectares for 50 years. One member of the Garo Students' Union (GSU), Aradonga unit, expressed their fears, stating, "If mining is carried out in our area for 50 years, we will have nothing to live on. Our children will have nothing to live on. The catchment we have for our coming generations will be gone, and no matter what they give us in return, we will not get back what we have lost in more than a century."

The prospectors assured the villagers of proper consultation with them in the future regarding the project, but the villagers remain adamant, stating that they would not acquiesce to the destruction of their land and environment.

The villagers plan to [file complaints](https://www.indiatodayne.in/meghalaya/story/meghalayas-mallangkona-residents-up-in-arms-over-iron-ore-mining-in-area-1015494-2024-05-27#:~:text=30 PM IST-,Residents of Mallangkona in the district of West Khasi Hills,Nonglang sordarship around their area) with various government departments, including the office of the Chief Minister and the mining and forest departments. They have pledged to intensify their protest should their grievances remain unaddressed.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Office of the District Administration, West Khasi Hills

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Garo Students’ Union; Mallangkona Area Development Organization; Mallangkona Youth Multipurpose Society

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us