Chhattisgarh
Khodri, Khairbhawna, Amgaon and Churail villages
,
Gevra
,
Korba
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
February 1, 2025
MoEFCC grants multiple extensions to Kusmunda mine in Chhattisgarh despite public opposition
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
9250
Households affected
13000
People affected
2013
Year started
5166
ha.
Land area affected
9250
Households affected
13000
People Affected
2013
Year started
5166
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Coal Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The plans for expansion of the Kusmunda Opencast Coal Mine has been facing stiff opposition from the tribespeople in Korba district. One of the largest coal mines in the country, the Kusmunda mine is operated by South Eastern Coalfields Limited (SECL), a subsidiary of Coal India Limited. The project is classified under the Emergency Coal Production Plan

In 2015, the mining plan was improvised to expand the capacity of the mine from 18.75 MTPA to 62.5 MTPA. 

As per the [EIA report](https://www.enviscecb.org/205/KUSMUNDA (ENGLISH).pdf), the expansion plan would impact five villages -- Amgaon, Churail, Khodri, Khairbawna and Gevra -- in addition to the 12 villages already affected. It is estimated to displace almost 9,200 families across the 17 villages. 

On 11 February 2015, the residents opposed the project at a public hearing organised by the district administration. They alleged that they were not informed about the hearing in advance. According to the 2016 Amnesty International report, the residents of the villages are concerned about the impact of the mining on their lands, forests, water sources and livelihood practices, especially agriculture. 

According to a 2015 newspaper report, the tribespeople claimed that SECL had also not fulfilled the resettlement and rehabilitation promises for the land acquired earlier. There were also accusations of procedural irregularities in the proposal for mine expansion. A local political leader told the newspaper that the administration organised the public hearing in a different location instead of the villages affected. Another social activist reported discrepancies in the EIA report. 

In September 2015, SECL floated tenders to expand the mine's capacity without appropriate environmental clearance (EC) even as the mine was already operating at a capacity more than approved. Earlier in February 2014, SECL was granted EC to expand the capacity of the mine from 15 MTPA to 18 MTPA. 

Reportedly, the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) had first deferred the expansion proposal and demanded additional information based on the concerns voiced by activists and local people. Regardless, in February 2016, the project was granted EC to expand capacity from 18.75 MPTA to 26 MTPA.

In the same month, local activist Lakshmi Chauhan stated that the people had already organised a Gram Sabha in accordance with the guidelines of the Act for individual and community forest rights claims, but they were yet to hear back from the administration on the settlement of their claims. Meanwhile, the district administration oragnised a meeting on February 16 to acquire the No-Objection Certificate from the Gram Sabha after the expansion plan got EC. 

In 2016 again, over 600 villagers came together to collectively protest against the Gevra, Dipka and Kusmunda mines. The police reportedly arrested protesters. Subsequently, in July, Chauhan filed an appeal in the National Green Tribunal (NGT) to challenge the EC granted. 

Meanwhile, in December 2017, SECL again applied for an expansion to approximately double the production. The government granted permission in July 2018 amidst protests. In [January 2020](http://www.secl-cil.in/writereaddata/KSM 40 to 50 MTPA - 2020.pdf), the environment ministry approved the proposal of mine expansion for another 30 years. However, the forest clearance for approximately 44 hectares is still pending. 

On 15 July 2020, the NGT disposed of the appeal citing a delay in applying. It stated that the decision to weigh the environmental considerations at the cost of industrial requirements was at the discretion of the national government. 

In December 2021, villagers of 12 villages affected by Kusmunda mine, who had given their land to SECL in the 80s, staged a protest. Those who protested included land-displaced villagers of the acquired villages Khamhariya, Jarhajel, Durpa, Barpali, Dullapur, Jatraj Sonpuri, Mangaon, Barmpur Barkuta, Bhainsakhar and Gevra.

Ram Prasad Sahu, who is wandering for job rehabilitation and compensation, told ETV Bharat that after the land was acquired, he has been continuously submitting documents for employment to SECL. However, he is yet to get the promised employment.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

7612.32

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2009

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Coal, Government of India

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Coal India Limited, South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Gond, Kawar, Rathia and Agaria tribal communities

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey


Show more work
Latest updates
Ukhrul, Kamjong, Tengnoupal, Chandel
Manipur

Several mining agreements in Manipur granted without villagers' consent, environmental clearances

Gir Somanath
Gujarat

Gujarat farmers oppose land acquisition for Kodinar-Somnath railway project

Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Dima Hasao
Assam

Environmental Devastation and Human Fatalities: The Crisis of Illegal Coal Mining in Dima Hasao's Abandoned Mines

South Goa
Goa

In water-stressed Sancoale, locals protest Bhutani project with 700 swimming pools

Gir Somanath
Gujarat

Gujarat puts solar power project near Gir sanctuary on hold amid protest

Dimapur
Nagaland

Global Naga Forum calls for relocation of Assam Rifles camps from urban areas

Dimapur
Nagaland

DNSU demands relocation of sub-centre in GMC Midland

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us