Meghalaya
Lum Survey, Bara Bazaar
,
Shillong
,
East Khasi Hills
Published :
Jul 2024
|
Updated :
Hynniewtrep Youth Council dismantles alleged illegal settlements at Lum Survey in Shillong
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
80
Households affected
384
People Affected
2024
Year started
Land area affected
80
Households affected
384
People Affected
2024
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

The Hynniewtrep Youth Council (HYC), a pressure group in Meghalaya, took extreme measures against alleged illegal encroachment and drug peddling at Lum Survey, Shillong, by dismantling around 80 structures on 23 May 2024.

HYC president Roy Kupar Synrem had previously warned that the HYC would take matters into their own hands if the authorities did not act. Synrem justified the action by saying: "We had asked the district administration and the Defence Estate Officer (DEO) to immediately evict the illegal settlers from the said land. We went ahead because we did not receive any word from them till today."

The issue started on 25 April 2024, when the HYC voiced concerns over the illegal settlement of approximately 100 families near the Bara Bazar Fire and Emergency Station at Lum Survey, an area under the jurisdiction of the Shillong Cantonment Board (SCB). Synrem claimed that many settlers were outsiders, lacking voter identification cards issued in Meghalaya, and even alleged that some were Rohingya Muslims.

On 26 April, the HYC formally petitioned the Shillong Cantonment Board to evict the illegal settlers. During a meeting with SCB CEO Ayush Maurya, the HYC was informed that the land was under the DEO’s jurisdiction and that there was ongoing litigation regarding the land.

A joint inspection at Lum Survey was conducted on 8 May 2024, which involved additional magistrates, DEO officials from Guwahati, members of the Shillong Municipal Board, Shillong Cantonment Board, police, and HYC members. “During inspection we found that about 80-100 households were staying in the said plot of land by constructing huts used of plastics and other scrap materials and further on enquiry it is learned that these people were illegally staying there without any permission from the Cantonment Board or any other authority,” Synrem told reporters.

Following the demolition, the Superintendent of Police, Rituraj Ravi, informed the press that a case had been registered at Sadar Police Station against Synrem, Vice President Donbok Kharlyngdoh, Assistant General Secretary Isaac Basaiawmoit, and others involved in the eviction. “We have no problem in going to jail since we have done which was supposed to be the job of the government. The district administration should have evicted the illegal settlers immediately after the joint site inspection. But they decide not to act,” Kharlyngdoh told The Shillong Times

Synrem charged that Lum Survey had become a ‘den’ for drug dealing. He [emphasised](https://theshillongtimes.com/2024/05/24/hyc-dismantles-80-houses-at-lum-survey/#:~:text=“We cannot allow people involved,dismantling of their houses began.), "We cannot allow people involved in drug dealing to resume their illegal activities from this place."

Speaking to the media, the Deputy Commissioner of East Khasi Hills, Sibhi C Sadhu_, _stated, “The DEO and the district administration are on the “same page” in our effort to resolve the issue at the earliest legally. Nobody is allowed to take law into their own hands.”

Both Synrem and the Deputy Commissioner informed that the eviction issue of Lum Survey settlers is pending before the district court. The litigants in this case, according to reports, are not those whose houses were demolished, but rather three other people whose title suit against an eviction order by the Defense Estate Officer has been pending since 2006.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Defence Estate Officer (DEO), Guwahati; Shillong Cantonment Board; District Administration of East Khasi Hills; Shillong Municipal Board; Meghalaya Human Rights Commission

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Hynniewtrep Youth Council

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Meghalaya

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
Latest updates
Devbhoomi Dwarka
Gujarat

2,754 Gujarat Villages without Grazing Land, Residents Allege Forceful Acquisition by State

Ahmedabad
Gujarat

AMC Provides Rehabilitation to Street Vendors in Ahmedabad Following Protests Against Eviction

Bhavnagar
Gujarat

Farmers Oppose Limestone Mining on Fertile Land in Gujarat's Bhavnagar District

Junagadh
Gujarat

Relocated Maldharis Return to Gujarat's Gir Park, at Loggerheads with Forest Department

South Delhi
Delhi

Delhi Development Authority Demolishes Slum in Batla House, 800 Families Left Homeless

Jamnagar
Gujarat

Essar Port Threat to Mangroves, Livelihood of Fisherfolk in Gujarat

Surat
Gujarat

Fisherfolk Fear Livelihood Loss as Industry Body Plans Textile Park in Surat

Kutch
Gujarat

Agariya Farmers in Gujarat Demand Seasonal Land Rights, Minimum Support Price for Salt

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us