Maharashtra
Entire city of Mumbai and mumbai suburban district are affected, (the order is for whole of western railways
,
,
Mumbai Suburban
Published :
Jan 2023
|
Updated :
Eviction notice issued to thousands of slum dwellers living on railway land in Mumbai
Reported by
Shubham Kothari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2021
Year started
37
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2021
Year started
37
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Railways
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Railways
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In January 2022, the Indian Railways issued eviction notices to thousands of slum dwellers living on land of Mumbai Suburban Railway track. The conflict involves the entire land under western railways. The residents claim they have been living on the land for nearly seventy years and have been issued eviction notices with a notice period of seven days.

The conflict has its roots in the third railway line project connecting Surat district in Gujarat to Jalgaon district in North Maharashtra. Sanctioned in 2009, this project could not progress for many years as the land owned by Western Railways on that stretch was used by migrants from various states to build temporary hutments. In 2014, residents of these hutments approached the Gujarat High Court to prevent their eviction due to the project. The Court granted them a stay in that year. But in 2021, the matter was taken up again by the Gujarat High Court. This time the court ordered that all settlements be removed from the Railways' land so that the project could be implemented. While issuing this order, the court did not provide any appropriate rehabilitation to the affected population. This order was subsequently challenged in the Supreme court.

In December 2021, the Supreme Court upheld the order to evict slum dwellers living not just on Surat Jalgaon link road, but the entire stretch of western railways within six weeks of the order. However, the Supreme Court noted that railways has not followed its duty to protect public land even when it was empowered through separate laws like public premises act 1971, railways act 1989 and through the use of railway police. Noting that railways has first failed in its duty, it has to support people being evicted in rehabilitation along with state and central government. It ordered railways to give rent of Rs 2000 for six months during which their permanent rehabilitation was to be completed.

It also held that state governments and urban local bodies were to apply the relevant laws for rehabilitation. And wherever laws were unavailable to rehabilitate, slum dwellers could apply for rehabilitation through public housing schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana.

Following this order, eviction notices were issued to all slum dwellers living on Railway land. This included people living across Mumbai and nearby metropolitan region. The then housing minister, Jitendra Awhad opposed this order as he stated that entire Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority region doesn't have enough tenements for rehabilitation for entire railway land and therefore these evictions must not happen. While evictions across the city have not started, various settlements have been served notices and a few have also been demolished.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Western Railway

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Slum dwellers organisations across Mumbai

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Shubham Kothari

Shubham is a housing rights activist based in Mumbai. He has a post graduate from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai in urban policy and governance.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us