Rajasthan
,
Kumbhalgarh
,
Rajsamand
Published :
Mar 2022
|
Updated :
Businessmen Oppose Rajasthan HC's Order to Stay Construction around Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary
Reported by
Kuber Bathla
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2022
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2022
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

According to a 2015 order by the Department of Forest, Government of Rajasthan, construction activities within one kilometre around eco-sensitive zones (ESZs) are prohibited. One such ESZ is the Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary, which can potentially become a tiger reserve. The 2015 order restricted both commercial and residential constructions in the area, with a caveat that residential buildings having up to 20 rooms could operate as hotels.

In January 2022, Advocate Rituraj Singh Rathore submitted a petition in the Rajasthan High Court that numerous illegal constructions have come up in the region in violation of the 2015 order and, therefore, must be stopped. “Eight to 12 construction activities have already been stopped by the Department of Forest, and this court order should help prevent others too. The area under forest has been declining due to such illegal activities,” he told LCW.

The court took note of the order and stayed all construction activities in the area on January 18, 2022. However, business owners have opposed the decision.

One such business owner, on the condition of anonymity, told LCW that environment conservation and development should go hand-in-hand. He referred to the [ESZ guidelines from 2017](http://moef.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/1 Guidelines for Eco-Sensitive Zones around Protected Areas.pdf) by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change and pointed out that such guidelines permit the establishment of hotels and resorts with appropriate regulations. “Development should not be stopped but rather regulated in such regions. Tourism will only help the local economy, and this blanket ban does not consider construction activities that are vital,” he told LCW.

Harsh Vardhan, secretary and founder of the Tourism and Wildlife Society of India, shared a similar sentiment. He told LCW that all stakeholders were not consulted before the issuance of this blanket ban. “The court order is not clear about what kind of construction activities must be banned, and as a result the business owners face losses, especially ones that do not cause any harm to the environment. Conservation programmes should be people-friendly,” he said.
 
LCW reached out to Gayatri Rathore, principal secretary tourism and chairperson of the Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation, and Shreya Guha, principal secretary, Department of Forest, via email but did not get any response.

On March 16, 2022, the Rajasthan high court upheld the 2015 notification passed by the forest department, prohibiting all construction activity in the protected area. The court also directed that commercial tourism activity shall not be permitted in residential premises, except those sanctioned as per law.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

No items found.

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition to restriction on construction activities in ESZ

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Principal secretary, Department of Tourism; district collector, Rajsamand; district collector, Pali; Department of Forest

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Business owners

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Kuber Bathla

Kuber is a second-year student of Political Science and Economics at St. Stephen's College, University of Delhi, with interests in public policy, rural development, political analysis and organisation management. He is currently interning with the Observer Research Foundation. In the past, he has worked with Transform Rural India Foundation (an initiative of Tata Trusts) and India Development Review, learning research, data and organisation management.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

No items found.

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us