Goa
,
Benaulim
,
South Goa
Published :
Feb 2023
|
Updated :
March 13, 2023
Benaulim residents demand that Western Bypass be built on stilts, not earthen embankments
Reported by
Malavika Neurekar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
300
People affected
2019
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
300
People Affected
2019
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of Benaulim, a South Goan village, have demanded that a part of the Margaon National Highway Western Bypass Road be built on stilts instead of earthen embankments. The concerned part is 2.75 Km stretch that passes through the villages of Seraulim to Benaulim.

Residents contend that continuing the construction on the embankments would be damaging to the local ecology, as it would require filling of lakes and other water bodies as well as khazan lands (lands reclaimed from the river or sea). These lands are usually used for agricultural and fishing activities. Any damage to these areas is likely to impact agricultural and fishing related livelihoods in the area. Further, construction of the road on an earthen embankment involves land-filling which can block sewerage channels. Residents in Benaulim are already noticing water logging in the area.

According to a petition in the National Green Tribunal (NGT), the Public Works Department (PWD) and the contractor did not obtain permissions from concerned authorities – namely, Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority, the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, the Goa State Biodiversity Board, the Goa State Wetland Authority, the Town and Country Planning Department (TCPD), and the Benaulim Panchayat – before starting the work.

In November 2019, locals submitted their complaints to various authorities including the PWD, Water Resources Department (WRD), and the TCPD. This was followed by a joint inspection by these authorities along with the Directorate of Agriculture in December that year, and inspection reports were prepared. They recommended, among other things, that the bypass be built on stilts to minimise environmental impact.

The 11.09-km Western Bypass Road had been proposed for decongesting traffic through Margao city. Work on the section from Nuvem to Seraulim has been completed and, according to the NGT petition, was built on agricultural and khazan land. Social worker and Benaulim resident Royla Fernandes had filed the petition seeking that the remaining 2.75-km stretch from the wholesale fish market in Seraulim to Varca Road in Benaulim be built on stilts.

The recommended changes would raise the cost of the project from Rs 148.41 crore to Rs 218.94 crore, community members have pointed out. The petitioner pointed out that construction of the road on embankments would cause water stagnation and increased flooding, particularly in areas like Khareband, Tolleaband and Padda. She has sought directions from the court for the concerned authorities to conduct an environment impact assessment and submit a list of identified wetlands, as per an earlier 2019 NGT order. She has also sought an interim order restricting the contractor and PWD from proceeding with the work till the NGT concludes it hearing. 

After the first hearing, in June 2021, the NGT directed the formation of a 10-member panel comprising experts from Goa State Biodiversity Board, Goa State Wetland Authority, Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority, State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, South Goa District Magistrate, Water Resources Department, Public Works Department, State Pollution Control Board, National Wetland Authority and a PCCF (HoFF), Goa.

In November 2021, the panel recommended that the 980-metre stretch from Seraulim to the Mungul railway bridge be built on stilts but stayed silent on the stretch from Mungul to Benaulim.

Simultaneously, Fernandes filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application (208/2021) in a 2015 High Court case, asking that the court take note of the objections raised in the NGT plea. In 2015, the Goa bench of the Bombay High Court had taken suo moto cognizance of the delay in executing construction work on the bypass.

In its third hearing, the NGT in May 2022 said that it would hear the matter further only after High Court concludes the PIL to avoid passing conflicting orders. “There is no reason for NGT to defer hearing, because the HC case is completely different. The PIL in HC is regarding expediting construction work and has nothing to do with the environment. My plea in the NGT highlights the ecological concerns that this project raises,” Fernandes told LCW.

Even while the case is pending, land filling of water bodies has been taking place along the stretch. Residents have submitted a memorandum to the governor led by Aam Aadmi Party MLA Venzy Viegas. They also launched a signature campaign to raise their concerns. In July 2022, the village was inundated with rain, further intensifying the demand for stilts.

The next hearing of the matter in the High Court took place in January 2023. The discussion largely focused on the speeding up the project.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Modification in project plan/execution

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

fishing, Water bodies, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

148.41

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Goa state government; Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways; Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority; Goa State Environment Impact Assessment Authority; Goa State Biodiversity Act; Goa State Wetland Authority; Public Works Department; Water Resources Department; Town & Country Planning Department; Directorate of Agriculture; Collector (South Goa); Benaulim Panchayat

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

M/s M. Venkata Rao Infra Projects Pvt Ltd

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Malavika Neurekar

Malavika graduated from Azim Premji University with a Master's in Development. She has worked as a journalist and has written for Hindustan Times, Scroll and Mint Lounge.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

fishing, Water bodies, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us