Karnataka
,
Nadsal, Hejamady, Nandikuru and Palimar
,
Udupi
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Land Owners in Karnataka's Udupi Demand Return of Excess Land Acquired by KIADB
Reported by
Deepak C N
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
2000
People affected
2006
Year started
260
Land area affected
Households affected
2000
People Affected
2006
Year started
260
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In 2006, Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) acquired around 641.915 acres of land in Nadsal, Hejamady, Nandikuru and Palimar villages in Udupi district for turbine maker Suzlon Energy Limited to build windmills in these villages. However, over the years, the land changed hands to Synefra Engineering and Construction Limited and from them to Aspen Infra Limited. Notably, the villages were also been identified as Special Economic Zones since 2007.
In 2016, it was reported that Aspen Infra Limited was attempting to sell around 147 acres of the acquired land to a bidder. Land owners who had lost their land alleged that KIADB acquired excess land than required and that frequent changes in ownership had led to large-scale fraud. This was also echoed by social activists Lolaksha and Vidya Dinker, who highlighted how 641 acres of land were acquired by KIADB for Suzlon despite the latter's 'official' requirement of 150 acres as was publicly stated. It was also brought to attention that nearly 500 acres of land had remained unutilised.
In a 2016 report, Lolaksha informed that Suzlon R and R Colony Abhivruddhi Samiti had lodged a protest against the proposed sale by Aspen Infra Limited via a letter to Rathna Prabha, additional chief secretary, Department of Industries and Commerce. They demanded that all vacant lands should be returned to their original owners under the 'zameen wapsi' (land return) scheme.
Further, criticising the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, as a legal instrument to facilitate land grabs, the activists demanded immediate repeal of the law and for the state government to publish a white paper delineating various land allotments to the SEZs in the state.
From May 24-28, 2019, LCW spoke to several members of the Dalit Sangharsh Samiti with the help of Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha who reiterated their relentless demand for the return of the excess land acquired. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to get back acquired land

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Return of excess land acquired for the project

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1000

Type of investment:

Investment Made

Year of Estimation

2006

Page Number In Investment Document:

1

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Suzlon Infrastructure Limited, M/s. Synefra Engineering & Construction Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Residents

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Deepak C N
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to get back acquired land

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us