Gujarat
Kherkuva and Sureva villages, Ekta Nagar
,
Bhadarva
,
Narmada
Published :
May 2024
|
Updated :
Villagers oppose land acquisition for Ekta Nagar airport to boost connectivity to Statue of Unity in Gujarat
Reported by
Suchak Patel
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
164
Households affected
782
People affected
Year started
Land area affected
164
Households affected
782
People Affected
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Statue of Unity, boasting the world's tallest statue, attracted around 5 million visitors in 2023. Recognizing the need for improved accessibility, the government has proposed the construction of a new airport nearby.

On February 6, 2024, the Gujarat government informed to the state Assembly, through a written response, its plans for a new airport in Ekta Nagar aimed at enhancing connectivity to the Statue of Unity. In response to a query raised by Shailesh Mehta, BJP MLA from Dabhoi, the government disclosed that land in three villages – Kherkuva, Bhadarva, and Sureva – in Tilakwada taluka, Narmada district, has been earmarked for the airport project.

According to a report by The Indian Express, the government's response, shared by Mehta, indicated, "Out of the land earmarked for the airport, approximately 210 square metres are privately owned, with permission granted by the state government on November 20, 2023, to proceed with land acquisition."

The statement emphasised the necessity of developing a modern airport in the area due to the significant influx of domestic and international tourists visiting the Statue of Unity. Additionally, it mentioned that the Airports Authority of India (AAI) is currently preparing a pre-feasibility report, following which land acquisition activities will commence.

Even as Mehta said that only 210 square metres are privately owned, the project proposal or plan has not been made public yet to gauge the actual land area that will be acquired for the project. However, villagers have already started opposing the project.

It is important to note that Narmada is a Schedule V district where PESA Act is applicable, making it mandatory to consult with Gram Sabhas before undertaking any land acquisition or development project.

On 21 February 2024, farmers from four villages - Ferkua, Bhadarva, Ruppura, and Surva in the Tilakwada Taluka of Narmada District - submitted a letter to the District Collector collectively opposing the project. "If our land is acquired, we will become landless, making it extremely difficult for us to sustain our livelihoods as we do not possess other skills," the letter read.

Earlier, on February 15, 2024, the four villages under the Bhadarva Panchayat had passed a resolution to oppose giving up our ancestral land.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Suchak Patel
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us