Maharashtra
,
Melghat
,
Amravati
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
Maharashtra Government Relocates Tribal Families from Melghat Tiger Reserve, Communities Resist
Reported by
Prerna Chaurashe
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
200
People affected
2007
Year started
300
Land area affected
Households affected
200
People Affected
2007
Year started
300
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Melghat was declared a tiger reserve in 197374 and was later notified as a critical tiger habitat (CTH) in 2007 under the new Wildlife Protection (Amendment) Act, 2006. The entire reserve is spread over 2,029 square kilometres, of which 1,500 square kilometres is CTH. The core area comprises many tribal villages. Bori, Kund and Koha villages were relocated in 2001. The relocation of Vairat, Churni and Dhargad villages started in 2003 and were completed in 2012. The conflict started in May 2007 as tensions began to grow after the government passed a resolution demanding the relocation of 87 villages from the core area. The government offered them compensation as per a policy proposed by the National Tiger Conservative Authority, which would compensate every eligible family with INR 10 lakh. Additionally, the Maharashtra government promised to compensate the land owners with an amount equal to the value of their land. But the tribal families wanted to reclaim their land under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006. In many cases, their rights were rejected and they were forcibly relocated as "encroachers". The tribes accused the forest department of not letting them cultivate on their agricultural land. The revenue department asked the local talathi (a person who maintains the revenue record of the village) to investigate. But largescale discrepancies crept in. Forest dwellers who had occupied land prior to 2005 were not allotted land while some who settled after 2005 received land for cultivation. In 2017, a group of 1,200 tribal from eight villages, who were relocated five years ago, returned to the forests and occupied the place for 36 hours, demanding rehabilitation facilities and better compensation. In an academic paper by Elenora Fanari (2019), a total of 1,360 families got displaced after 2008. According to a 2016 report, about 19 villages remain to be rehabilitated from the core area. In January 14, 2019, the tribal people expressed their unhappiness at the compensation petitioned to the district collector's office and the forest department. They demanded the forest department to return their land. On January 22, a protest turned violent after which the state reserve police force and riot control police force were deployed. The police arrested 20 protesters. The relocation is said to be in progress, and so is the continuous resistance by tribal people to seek back their land. Despite the rejection of some claims, the District Level Committee (DLC) granted community forest rights and fishing rights on over 3,000 hectares within the tiger reserve. The Melghat Tiger Reserve officials have expressed their discontent over this decision.
In June 2020, the DLC again recognised individual forest claims of 76 people in Semadoh village within the reserve under the FRA. However, environmental activists have opposed this move and have demanded their resettlement outside the reserve area.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to get back acquired land

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for more compensation than promised

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Protection against forced eviction, Demand for more compensation and rehabilitation if evicted.

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest department, National Board for Wildlife

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/talegaon-villagers-reap-crores-after-land-acquisition/

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Prerna Chaurashe


Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to get back acquired land

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for more compensation than promised

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us