Himachal Pradesh
,
Nurpur
,
Kangra
Published :
Jan 2020
|
Updated :
September 24, 2024
Residents demand fair compensation for Pathankot-Mandi four-lane project in Himachal Pradesh
Reported by
Meenakshi Kapoor
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
3781
People affected
2018
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
3781
People Affected
2018
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

In 2017, Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways announced a four-lane project for the Pathankot-Mandi National Highway-154. The National Highway Authority (NHAI) planned to expand the width of the highway to 45-metre. The strategically important road would reduce the distance from Pathankot to Mandi from 219-kilometre to 171-kilometre and improve the traffic. 

In March 2018, the NHAI issued a notification for the land acquisition under clause 3 (D) of the National Highways Act. Following this, the acquisition process began in the Nurpur subdivision of Kangra district. However, in June 2019, NHAI discontinued this process due to high circle rates of land in the district. 

In September 2019, the NHAI decided to change the width of the proposed highway from 45 metres to 33 metres and planned to utilise the old tracks to reduce the cost of land to be acquired. According to a news report, it also decided to change the alignment of the proposed project to minimise environmental degradation, excessive hill-cutting, and landslides on the highway route after the state government raised concerns over it.

The pause in the land acquisition process reportedly left the project-affected residents in a state of uncertainty as they had already taken loans for rehabilitation and even began setting up houses and businesses in other locations.

In October 2019, the Four Lane Lok Body (FLLB) submitted a memorandum demanding clarity on the project's future. Following this, on October 29, the President of FLLB, Rajesh Pathania, sat on an indefinite hunger strike after receiving no response on the project's status. He called off the strike on November 14 after the intervention by the District Collector of Kangra, who convinced the Kangra Central Cooperative Bank Ltd to defer the recovery of the loan, and the NHAI agreed to pay 12 per cent interest on the compensation amount. 

However, in March 2020, the president of FLLB claimed that the assurance to defer the loan was not fulfilled. 

By September, the project started again in accordance with the revised alignment. As per the officially communicated information, the project will acquire land from 31 revenue mohals for project's phase I. It would affect 3,781 persons. 

In November 2020, protests rekindled against acquisition rates announced by the Competent Authority for Land Acquisition (CACA) for two of the mohals. The representatives of Four-Lane Sangarsh Samiti alleged CACA of ignoring the provisions under the LARR Act 2013. According to them, the DC of Kangra had approved the rate of Rs 7,000 per square metre in 2018-19. However, CACA only awarded Rs 1,680 per square metre in the new announcement. 

The project-affected residents rejected the awards.

On February 26, 2021, the protestors staged a dharna against the acquisition awards offered. They again submitted a memorandum demanding adherence to the approved circle rates as the current rates were insufficient for rehabilitation.

The president of the Samiti also appealed to the Chief Justice of Himachal High Court for intervention to protect the interests of the residents. They have accused CACA of flouting provisions.

On March 13, 2021, protestors met the Chief Minister to discuss their concerns. As per a news report, the protestors plan to intensify the protests and threaten direct action if the state government does not address their grievances. They appealed to the union minister requesting four times the market value of land be offered as compensation.

Meanwhile, the project-affected persons have also raised concerns over the partial acquisition of their lands as it would render the remaining property useless. 

In 2023, land acquisition for this stretch was discontinued. A new project report was required due to the decision to convert the previously-approved two lane highway into a four-lane highway which necessitates revised environmental clearance.

In March 2024, the government declared that land acquisition process will be resumed. However, the project report had not been finalised till May 2024.

As of 2022, the cost of the project had increased by 20%. However, a revised estimate is not yet available.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for more compensation than promised

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Affected community wanted the land acquisition process to resume

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

<https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/himachal/work-on-palampur-padhar-road-stretch-hangs-fire-for-3-years-620621/>

Total investment involved (in Crores):

10000

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

National Highways Authority of India

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

National Highways Authority of India

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

N/A

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Four Lane Lok Body, Four Lane Sangarsh Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Meenakshi Kapoor

Meenakshi is an independent researcher currently based in Himachal Pradesh. She has a Master's in Environmental Management from the Forest Research Institute. She has formerly worked with the Centre for Policy Research, Namati and Kalpavriksh on issues of environmental compliance and regulation. Her interest in the politics of regulatory action gave her the opportunity to study institutions such as the Coastal Zone Management Authorities and the ESA Monitoring Committees. She has also researched on natural resource governance and large-scale land-use change in Indonesia and Myanmar and is experienced in extensive research, writing and advocacy on the Coastal Regulation Zone law of India. Besides researching and reporting from the hills, she enjoys farming, cooking her harvest, tending to her plants and pets, reading in the sun and counting the number of hues at sunset.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for more compensation than promised

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

<https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/himachal/work-on-palampur-padhar-road-stretch-hangs-fire-for-3-years-620621/>

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us