Gujarat
,
Vadodara, Valsad, Dapivali, Sonavale and Yeranjad
,
Navsari
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
February 21, 2025
Over 3,000 farmers to lose livelihood for Vadodara-Mumbai Expressway project, demand higher compensation
Reported by
Surabhi Bhandari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
3110
Households affected
1598
People affected
2016
Year started
3205
ha.
Land area affected
3110
Households affected
1598
People Affected
2016
Year started
3205
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

The Vadodara-Mumbai Expressway project has been facing stiff opposition from land owners in Navsari and Valsad districts in Gujarat, thereby delaying the land acquisition process. Over 22 villages are likely to be affected by this 380-kilometre road project.

In June 2016, around 35 people were detained to prevent them from protesting when the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) officials reached one of the villages for measurement activities. There have been reports of stone pelting and light lathi charge; the measurement activities were carried out in spite of the protest.

The land acquisition will lead to the loss of livelihood for over 3,100 families in these villages as their main source of income is agriculture. Even though the government has promised land in lieu of land and house in lieu of house to the affected families, till date, government officials have not taken any steps to ensure that. The project has received all the mandatory clearances.

In September and October 2019, the Gujarat High Court passed orders directing the state government to apply a multiplying factor of 2.00 instead of 1.00 and recalculate the compensation payable to farmers. The state government, however, challenged the orders in the Supreme Court.

In June 2020, the Navsari district administration started issuing compensation notices to farmers to expedite land acquisition for the Vadodara-Mumbai Expressway project, giving them two months to give up their land. The notice stated that to avail compensation, the farmers have to submit certified copies of their PAN card, voter ID card or driving licence, along with two copies of photographs, a copy of their bank passbook and the government documents related to the land.

A week prior, the NHAI officials forcefully procured agricultural lands from farmers of Old Diva village in Bharuch district, and over 35 farmers who protested were detained by the police.

Sailesh, a farmer who was given INR 1.21 lakh for his 2.3035 hectares of land, told the media, "The compensation amount for my land is negligible. I cannot buy another piece of land with this money and the leftover land is so less. I have been cultivating vegetables. Now my income will stop."

According to Khedut Samaj Gujarat Navsari District President Pinakin Patel, the compensation is being paid at 2011 _jantri _rates.

In January 2021, responding to the plea filed by the state government in 2019, the Supreme Court upheld the Gujarat high court's orders, guaranteeing an additional payment of Rs 200 crore in total.

The foundation-laying ceremony for the second phase of the Delhi-Mumbai Expressway, focusing on the Vadodara-Mumbai stretch, was held
on 13 December 2024 in Muli village, Valsad. However, around 300 farmers protested against the non-payment of remaining compensation for acquired land, forcing officials to stop the work.

The highway, passing through Valsad and Navsari districts, is expected to be completed within 18 months at a cost of Rs 1,280 crore. Farmers remain dissatisfied because despite assurances they haven’t received payments for land in the second phase.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1755

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2020

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

National Highways Authority of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Village residents

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Surabhi Bhandari
Show more work
Latest updates
Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Chengalpattu
Tamil Nadu

EC for Sun Pharma's expansion in Vedanthangal bird sanctuary put to abeyance

Purulia
West Bengal

Land acquisition for Turga storage project in West Bengal violates FRA

Hooghly
West Bengal

Hooghly residents in West Bengal oppose railway project over water body

Paschim Medinipur
West Bengal

Jindal Group returns land to West Bengal government, land losers demand jobs

Sundergarh
Odisha

Villagers in Odisha's Sundergarh protest over delay in R&R settlement for land acquired in 1988 for Mahanadi Coalfields

Nuapada
Odisha

Displaced people of Lower Indra Irrigation project await rehabilitation

Jajpur
Odisha

Farmers affected by Angul-Sukinda railway line in Odisha demand adequate compensation

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us