Madhya Pradesh
Rinatola tehsil in Dindori district and Anuppur district
,
Shobhapur
,
Dindori
Published :
Jan 2017
|
Updated :
Farmers Refuse to Give Land for Upper Narmada Irrigation Project in MP
Reported by
Arpit Deshmukh
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
6634
People affected
2001
Year started
2438
Land area affected
Households affected
6634
People Affected
2001
Year started
2438
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In 2001, the Narmada Valley Development Authority sanctioned the Upper Narmada Irrigation project, a multipurpose dam to be built on the Narmada river in Anuppur and Dindori districts. The project also involved a composite dam to be built in the neighbouring village of Shobhapur in Rinatola tehsil in Dindori. The project proposed to irrigate 18,616 hectares of area in Anuppur and Dindori districts. The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change as well as the Ministry of Tribal Affairs cleared the project along with the Rehabilitation and Resettlement plan that would be applied to 27 villages that are likely to be submerged. The project has met with stiff opposition by the residents of these villages. They do not want to give away their land and have filed a petition in the Madhya Pradesh high court. Struggle and controversy related to the project has been ongoing since early 2000s when the contract to start work was granted. Since 2011, there has been strong opposition against the project after the contract to build the dam was awarded. The notification to acquire land was issued as per the new LARR Act, 2013. In 2016, it was reported that the Narmada Valley Development Authority was likely to reconsider the project in light of the opposition to dam construction and land acquisition. But in May 2020, the state government, through Narmada Basin Projects Company Limited, signed an MoU with the Central governments Power Finance Corporation to reinstate the project and get a loan to complete the construction work.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project scrapped

Original Project Deadline

2016

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

569.59

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Central Water Commission

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Narmada Valley Development Authority, Narmada Basin Projects Company Limited, Power Finance Corporation

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Medha Engineering Infrastructures

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Janta Dal United, Gondwana Gantantra Party

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Arpit Deshmukh
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project scrapped

Original Project Deadline

2016

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us