Tamil Nadu
,
Kodaikanal
,
Dindigul
Published :
Jul 2022
|
Updated :
Twenty years on, community still distressed by mercury waste dumped by HUL in Kodaikanal
Reported by
Hariprasad Radhakrishnan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
591
Households affected
People affected
2001
Year started
9
Land area affected
591
Households affected
People Affected
2001
Year started
9
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Manufacturing
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Manufacturing
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Hindustan Unilever Ltd.'s (HUL) thermometer factory, was in the news again for the mercury waste it had disposed off in 2001 in Kodaikanal. Set up in the 1980s, the factory was forced to shut down in 2001. The factory had dumped mercury filled glass thermometers in the scrapyard in Kodaikanal and the nearby watershed forest, causing soil and water pollution in the area. Activists alleged that the mercury pollution caused by the now defunct factory unit led to deaths of at least 45 factory workers and 12 children. In 2003, the company exported nearly 300 tonnes of dumped mercury waste from Kodaikanal to the US for recycling.

But the company provided no relief to its workers who reported ailments including kidney failure, heart ailments, skin allergy, etc. Instead, HUL denied having caused such a massive scale of pollution, citing studies conducted by different technical experts to argue that mercury did not cause any negative impact on workers' health. Despite the denials by HUL, a study by the Department of Atomic Energy in 2016 found mercury levels in the area to be 11 times more than the standard set by the United States Environment Protection agency and nearly 20 times higher than Canadian safety standards. Following a 15 year old campaign led by the ex-workers of HUL's Kodaikanal factory unit, the Madras High Court issued an order in 2016, directing HUL to provide compensation to the families affected by the mercury pollution caused by the factory. In 2016, the company provided ex-gratia compensation to 591 former workers/association members and their families.

HUL's Kodaikanal unit resurfaced in the news in 2021 after it felled more than 300 trees in its now defunct factory, which lies next to the Kodaikanal Wildlife Sanctuary. The tree felling by HUL was carried out in 2020 as part of its activities for soil remediation or clean-up. Activists in the area opposed the tree felling on the ground that HUL did not have the required clearances for felling trees. It is also feared that clearing trees might cause mercury contamination in the nearby Pambar-Shola forest, and the perennial Pambar river, which is half a kilometre from there.

In April 2022, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) ruled that there were no violations in the bio-remediation for mercury contamination carried out by Unilever in Kodaikanal, which involved felling of trees. Taking note of the matter on a suo motu basis, the NGT declared that HUL had the necessary permissions from the Central and Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Boards for conducting its bioremediation activities.

Nityanand Jayaraman, an environmental activist who has been fighting against the mercury pollution by Unilever, told LCW that the judgement had missed the point raised by the respondent. “It has not gone into our allegation of the washing away of mercury into Pambar Shola. Further, the Chief Wildlife Warden did not authorise the clear-felling of trees which were located inside the Kodaikanal Wildlife Sanctuary.” He further said that activists were examining the possibility of further appeal against the verdict, but it was unlikely.    

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, CSIR-NEERI, Central Pollution Control Board, Department of Atomic Energy

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Hindustan Unilever Ltd

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Tamil Nadu Alliance Against Mercury, Chennai Solidarity Group, Jhatkaa, Chennai Climate Action Group

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Hariprasad Radhakrishnan

Hariprasad is a Tamil Nadu-based independent journalist who writes primarily on environmental and developmental issues. He has worked for and contributed to a number of leading publications. He can often be seen playing chess or struggling to learn the keyboard.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us