Karnataka
,
Tumkur
,
Tumkur
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Farmers Await Promised Compensation for Land Acquired for Tumkur-Rayadurga Railway Project in Karnataka
Reported by
Deepak C N
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
2880
People affected
2007
Year started
543
Land area affected
Households affected
2880
People Affected
2007
Year started
543
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Railways
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Railways
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Farmers and villagers along the stretch of the proposed new railway line between Tumkur in Karnataka and Rayadurga in Andhra Pradesh have delayed the project, which was sanctioned by the Ministry of Railways in 200607. A total of 102 kilometres of the proposed 213kilometre railway line passes through Karnataka, while a length of 111 kilometres will pass through Andhra Pradesh. The new line is estimated to reduce the distance between Bengaluru and Bellary by at least 30 kilometres and provide rail connectivity to backward regions in Karnataka Koratagere, Madhugiri and Pavagada. However, land acquisition for the project has proven to be a formidable hurdle. Since 2012, farmers have been agitating for higher compensation. When Deputy Commissioner (DC) R.K. Raju held a meeting with farmers over the acquisition in 2012, they demanded a compensation of INR 67 lakh per unit of land to be acquired for the project, which was more than the guidance value. Along with a higher compensation, they alo demanded job for one family member from each family who would lose their land as well as allotment of government land. The DC noted their demands, stating that he would submit a proposal to the government. As per a report in 2014, not a single acre of land had been handed over to the Southwestern Railways even years after the project was sanctioned. However, it was later reported in the same year that though 47 acres of land near Tumkur were handed over to Southwestern Railways in January 2014, work was yet to commence as farmers continued to agitate, demanding higher compensation. In 2015, it was reported that work on the railway line could not be started as compensation was yet to be paid and farmers continued to agitate. Reportedly, the state government failed to pay the compensation even though the Railways had already deposited INR 44.41 crore with the Special Land Acquisition Officer. According to a project report updated in 2018, 25 per cent of the project had been completed and close to 266 acres had been handed over by the Karnataka government to the Railways. LCW was unable to reach the Tumkur special land acquisition officer for comments. On June 7, 2019, LCW spoke to Anand Patel, president of the Tumkur faction of the Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha, who said that some farmers had reportedly received notification of compensation but that the case was nowhere close to being resolved.  In February 2021, it was reported that construction for the railway line would finally begin from June 2021. As per the report, preparatory work in engineering, procurement and construction mode has been initiated.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for employment

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for promised land

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2062

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Karnataka, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ministry of Railways

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Deepak C N
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand for employment

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for promised land

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us