Maharashtra
Dara, Virpur, Navagaon, Rampur, Fattepur, Nande/Nandya, Chinchora, Kansai, Kusumwada, Limbdi, Bhutte Akaspur, Pimprani, Lonkheda
,
Shahda taluka
,
Nandurbar
Published :
Aug 2023
|
Updated :
Tribespeople in villages of Nandurbar district oppose construction of additional pipeline in their area in Maharashtra
Reported by
Shubham Kothari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
1984
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
1984
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In May 2023, tribespeople of villages in scheduled five areas of Nandurbar district in Maharashtra are opposing plans to divert water away from their region.

The gram panchayat of Dara village in Nandurbar, Maharashtra recently received a letter from Lonkheda village requesting them to give land to establish a water pump and water pipelines through their village. Sparking anxiety in the affected villages about water being diverted away from their area to other parts of the state. 

These pipelines are expected to be connected to the Dara Dharan Dam to supply water to more areas. The Dara Dharan Dam is located in the northern stretch of Nandurbar district of Maharashtra.

The region is largely populated by Bhil and Pawra communities and has been declared a Schedule five area. All 14 villages are Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Areas (PESA) act villages.

Dara and 13 other villages consider themselves as the original beneficiaries of the Dara Dharan project.

According to Rajendra Thackerey, a resident of Dara village, back in the 1970s organised themselves under the Communist Party of India (Marxist) In the 1980s they constituted the Dara Dharan Samiti to demand for the construction of a dam on the Unab Deb river.** **

"In 1984 the Dara Dharan project was approved. However, its construction did not start for 10 years. In 1994 the villagers started massive agitations to initiate the construction of the project. The protestors made elaborate drawings and plans on distribution of water for irrigation from the dam to 14 villages in the area. The Samiti also demanded equal distribution of water to all villagers including landless laborers to ensure equal development of all", Thackeray told LCW.** **

Following the protests, the dam was finally constructed in 1996. However, the canals to carry water to the villages for irrigation were not constructed. The villagers kept on writing to the administration to expedite the process of canal construction. The demand remains unfulfilled till date.

In May 2023, the gram panchayat of a non PESA village, Lonkheda, informed the Virpur gram panchayat (a PESA village) of their plans to construct a pipeline for taking the water from the Dara Dharan to Shahda industrial belt region. The request has been made under the Jal Jeevan Mission. The question that Virpur residents are asking is as to why is water not being requested from the Susrika village, which is around 3 Kilometres away from Lonkheda village.

In PESA villages, projects require prior permission of the gram sabha. Their gram sabhas or village councils have passed a resolution denying the request for water diversion from the Shahda region and submitted it to the collector and tehsildar of Nandurbar District.

On 30th of May 2023 a delegation of Adivasi Ekta Parishad and Jotiba Ambedkar Study Circle met the tehsildar to immediately stop the projects for diverting water to Lonkheda. If this is not done, they said protests across the Shahda taluka will be held. 

Nandurbar's district collector has denied knowledge of the request made by Lonkheda village panchayat and he assured that he will speak to all stakeholders before any actions are taken, when the villagers went to meet with him.** **

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to develop irrigation canal

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Drinking Water & Sanitation Ministry of Jalshakti

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Shubham Kothari

Shubham is a housing rights activist based in Mumbai. He has a post graduate from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai in urban policy and governance.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us