Arunachal Pradesh
Bichom, Tenga, Khuppi, Buragaon, Yayung
,
Kimi
,
West Kameng
Published :
Mar 2020
|
Updated :
August 20, 2024
Tribes in Arunachal Demand Promised Roads, Jobs as Compensation for Hydropower Project
Reported by
Yaniam Chukhu
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
98
Households affected
470
People affected
2018
Year started
710
Land area affected
98
Households affected
470
People Affected
2018
Year started
710
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Kameng Hydro Electric Power Project in West Kameng district is a run-off water scheme that will directly utilise the water flow from the Bichom and Tenga rivers to generate 600MW of electricity. The project is being undertaken by the North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Limited (NEEPCO). The total cost was initially estimated at Rs 2,496 crore but was later revised to Rs 8458.94 crore.

The project stretches over 80 kilometers and includes two dams and a powerhouse with 4 units of 150 MW each. The project is said to contribute to the nation's hydro capacity addition and help make Arunachal Pradesh a power-surplus state. It is intended to form part of the projected hydro capacity addition of 30000 MW by 2030.

According to a memorandum submitted to the chief minister on 26 November 2019, by the Aka Elite Society (AES), people in five villages - Bichom, Buragaon, Kimi, Khuppi and Yayung - comprising more than 500 families, have lost their agricultural lands to the project site and to the Power House Complex “without any compensation”. This, the AES claims, is on the “pretext” of the land falling under reserve forest. The memorandum states that the land has been “under the possession of our ancestors since time immemorial”.

In lieu of money, the members of the Hrusso Aka and Bugun communities, the dominant tribes in the affected villages, had put forth two demands to NEEPCO: good road connectivity from Pinjoli village to Bichom (92 kilometres) and Grade C and D jobs under the Union government. Neither demand has been fulfilled till date.

When LCW spoke to the project-affected persons (PAPs), they said they did not oppose the project in the hope of better road connectivity, education and healthcare, as promised by NEEPCO officials. “We were promised good roads long ago. We do not have any issue with heavily loaded trucks transporting material for the project, but it has made our roads non-motorable. Who will take responsibility? Neither the state nor the NEEPCO officials are responding,” a resident of Buragaon told LCW.

The memorandum claimed that every time the PAPs asserted their demand for jobs, NEEPCO responded by saying that the Ministry of Power and the Supreme Court had “banned” recruitment.

The foundation stone of the project was laid in 2002. In the past 18 years, there have been multiple rounds of dialogue between the PAPs and both NEEPCO and state offcials, but the primary demands of the people for roads and jobs have remained unfulfilled, even though NEEPCO did build rehabilitation and resettlement colonies.

The AES has been leading negotiations and protests and raising awareness about the promises made by NEEPCO and their right to fair compensation.

On February 10, 2020, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which has been tasked with operating the turbine, officially started operations of two units of 4x150 megawatt of the hydroelectric project. It is reported to be the largest unit rating (150 megawatt) for hydropower generating sets in the state. Not only were the units launched amidst ongoing protests but the PAPs also did not know about its operations.

In January 2021, the plant was fully commissioned with the commissioning of its third unit, after units 2 and 3 were commissioned in June and July 2020.

On 19 November 2024, PM Modi launched the 600 MW Kameng hydropower project in Arunachal Pradesh’s West Kameng district.

The Kameng hydroelectric project has been found to have a significant impact on the villages downstream of the Bichom River in Arunachal Pradesh. Despite being a 600 MW project, it has dramatically reduced the once powerful river to a mere stream. Residents downstream have reported a sharp decline in aquatic life, with fish nearly disappearing due to the drastically reduced flow of the Bichom River. Furthermore, the project has resulted in severe water scarcity in the region, directly affecting agricultural and horticultural activities and causing financial strain on the local population. The KaHEP Downstream People's Affected Forum (KDPAF) has urged government intervention and has also approached NEEPCO to address the issue. The villagers are seeking compensation for their losses through KDPAF and have advised NEEPCO to ensure the continuous flow of the Bichom River.

It's important to note that approval was granted for the diversion of [710 hectares of forest land](https://neepco.co.in/sites/default/files/4. KaHEP.pdf) for non-forestry purposes for the construction of the project. The total cost of compensatory afforestation (CA), if any afforestation, is estimated at Rs 640.88 lakh.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for employment

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for compensation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Road connectivity, Jobs

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Agricultural land, Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Fishing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

8271.03

Type of investment:

Investment Made

Year of Estimation

2022

Page Number In Investment Document:

3

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Power

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

SMEC (Surbana Jurong Group)

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Aka Elite Society, All Bugun Society, KaHEP Downstream People's Affected Forum (KDPAF)

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Yaniam Chukhu
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for employment

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for compensation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Agricultural land, Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Fishing

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

No

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us