Jharkhand
Latehar
,
Mahautar
,
Gumla
Published :
Apr 2017
|
Updated :
August 5, 2024
After 30 years of protest, victory for tribals as Jharkhand cancels Netarhat Firing Range extension
Reported by
Alok
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
250000
People affected
1993
Year started
147100
Land area affected
Households affected
250000
People Affected
1993
Year started
147100
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Landbank
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Landbank
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

For nearly three decades, tribal communities have been agitating against the proposed Netarhat Firing Range in Gulma and Lathehar districts in Jharkhand. When the government proposed to create a land bank of nearly 80 acres in the range to attract investors, irate tribespeople called for a _bandh _on March 29, 2017, to boycott then Chief Minister Raghubar Das' public event at Mahautar in Latehar district. Public support to the _bandh _led to the cancellation of the chief minister's visit. Sub-divisional officer of Mahautar, Om Prakash, informed the media that the demands of the people had been forwarded to the chief minister's office and also to the chief secretary.

Dayamani Barla, a frontal tribal leader, told LCW that land bank of nearly 80-90 acres for the firing range was created by the government to invite investors to the state and to displace the tribal communities. "The government did not have the courage to displace tribals in 2000 when land acquisition for the firing range had begun as our protest forced the government to take a backstep. So the government is now trying to enter the Netarhat firing range by giving land to industrialists, Barla said.

The proposed firing range, spread across 245 villages, threatens to displace 2.75 lakh tribespeople. The issue was debated in the Rajya Sabha in 2007 when MP Mabel Rebello sought the government's stand on how it planned to rehabilitate the displaced families.

Gladson Dung Dung, another tribal activist of Pilot Project Netarhat Field Firing Range Virodhi Jan Sangharsh Samiti, told LCW that nearly 90 per cent of the land under the land bank falls under Schedule V and hence cannot be purchased or transferred. "Moreover, the land in question belongs to various Gram Sabhas. The government has no right to put this land under the land bank," he added.

On 23-24 March 2021, thousands of tribespeople participated in an annual congregation in Latehar demanding cancellation of the project. It is to be noted, however, that practice in the firing range and land acquisition were stopped in 1994 after massive public protests.

When asked about the current status of the project, Pramod Kumar Gupta, deputy commissioner of Latehar, told LCW it was the same as it was 10 years ago. "Nothing much has changed. However, most of the land falls in Gumla district, so I cannot say much," he added.

Gumla DC Shravan Sai did not respond to LCW's phone calls.

17 August 2022, marked a victorious day for the resisting communities as the Government of Jharkhand, under the leadership of Chief Minister Hemant Soren, declared that it will not renew the notification of the Netarhat Field Firing Range that expired on 11 May 2022.

The Deputy Commissioner of the Latehar district wrote to the Principal Secretary of the Jharkhand Government on 4 June 2022, listing the reasons for not extending the notification. One of the reasons was the atrocities of Army personnel of raping the Adivasi women.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Cancellation of the project

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

2022

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.newsclick.in/Jharkhand-Adivasi-Resistance-Netarhat-Firing-Range-Continues-27-years>

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

2022

Why did the conflict end?

Recognising the 30-year-old struggle led by the tribal people of the area against the project, the Government of Jharkhand said that public interest would be served by not re-notifying the firing range.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Defence

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Pilot Project Netarhat Field Firing Range Virodhi Jan Sangharsh Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Alok
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

2022

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.newsclick.in/Jharkhand-Adivasi-Resistance-Netarhat-Firing-Range-Continues-27-years>

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us