Manipur
,
,
Imphal East District
Published :
|
Updated :
Three churches demolished in Manipur's Imphal for 'illegal construction'
Reported by
Sarup Sinha
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2020
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2020
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Three churches in the Tribal Colony of Imphal East district were demolished by local authorities in the wee hours of April 11, 2023.
The All Manipur Christian Organisation (AMCO), the apex body representing the Christian community in Manipur, said the eviction drive at the Evangelical Baptist Convention Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church Manipur and Catholic Holy Spirit Church was carried out at 3 am when people were still sleeping. The body alleged that families living within the church premises, including pastors and caretakers were not given sufficient time to move their belongings. Many Christian residents gathered at the sites to perform prayers in the wake of the demolitions.
Condemning the evictions, the AMCO and the United Christian Forum of North East India (UCFNEI) criticised the state government for showing a lack of regard for religious sanctity and sentiments.
AMCO's joint secretary Rev L Manga said, "We are all in shock. We fully respect and acknowledge the law of the land and the government's decision. However, the manner they carried out the eviction is unacceptable because they (the government) didn't give us sufficient time and conducted the drive in the wee hours at 3 am when people were sleeping".
The eviction order, which includes the three churches, was served on December 24, 2020, by the sub-divisional officer of Porompat, alleging that 13 encroachers had encroached on government land via churches and garages.
The issue reached the High Court of Manipur after the All-Tribal Students' Union Manipur (ATSUM) petitioned the government to overturn the eviction order of eight churches in the Tribal Colony. The High Court had then passed the interim order for maintaining the status quo in the land under dispute.
On April 4, 2023, the High Court retracted its interim status quo order and allowed the government to take appropriate measures to vacate the land. In its order, the High Court relied upon a 2009 Supreme Court ruling to justify the State Cabinet's decision to remove churches build on government land. The churches contesting the matter argued that the religious structures had been in existence since 1974 and 1997 without any objection and interruption. The Court held that the churches had been built on government land without prior approval of the state government.
After the eviction, AMCO called the government's approach as discriminatory as it had previously regularised 188 religious structures in the state based on the Supreme Court's directives, but not a single church was included in the list.
The Christian bodies have submitted a memorandum to Prime Minister Narendra Modi through the Manipur Governor, seeking redress and resolution for the affected churches. They also plan to consult with various national organisations to address the reported atrocities faced by fellow Christians in the state.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for regularization of unauthorized constructions

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Manipur, District Administration of Imphal East, Committee of Unauthorised Construction of Religious Nature on Public Streets, Public Parks, Public Places, etc (Manipur)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

All Manipur Christian Organisation and United Christian Forum of North East India

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sarup Sinha

Sarup is a researcher and doctoral student in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. His research interests lie in the area of ethnic and land conflicts, political ecology and development and urban spaces of Northeast India. He has a Masters’ degree in Development Studies from the Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati. He has previously done research/internships with NABARD, Oxford Microfinance Initiative (renamed Oxford Development Consultancy) and CSDS (Lokniti Programme).

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us