Maharashtra
Pokhran Road, Thane
,
Thane
,
Thane
Published :
May 2020
|
Updated :
September 26, 2024
Thane church proposes using playground as burial space, residents object
Reported by
Varsha Torgalkar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
1750
Households affected
8400
People affected
2019
Year started
21
Land area affected
1750
Households affected
8400
People Affected
2019
Year started
21
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of three housing societies in Thane have objected to the proposal of a local church to use an open plot of land in their locality as a burial ground. They claim that the land has been reserved as a playground and it would not be a healthy sight for children playing in the park to witness burials.

The problem started in May 2019 when the residents of the housing societies noticed five crosses put up on the playground and all the playing equipment removed. Surekha Ambekar, a member of the housing society committee of Ravi Estate CHS, told LCW: “Residents of the three societies protested on 5 May 2019, after they noticed the crosses on the playground the day before. As per official documents, the plot belongs to the Thane Municipal Corporation (TMC), which has reserved it as a playground. There is hardly any playing space in cities and if available grounds are used for other purposes, where will our children play? Besides, burial ceremonies will create a morbid atmosphere for our residents.”

Parishioners, meanwhile, claim that no burial has been held so far and that the crosses were put up as a mark of protest against the dearth of burial spaces for the Christian community.

In March 2019, the TMC had lodged an FIR against 11 parishioners after they buried a 95-year-old former Army man in the premises of Our Lady of Mercy Church as there was no burial ground available.

According to Melwyn Fernandes, secretary of the Association of Concerned Catholics, the parishioners moved the Bombay High Court to seek permission for a burial ground inside the church premises. He says Roman Catholics have a tradition of burying their dead near a church.

In May 2019, the court ordered the TMC to measure the plot and determine which portion of the land is the playground and which portion belongs to the church.

“The TMC is yet to comply to the court order. We have requested the TMC commissioner multiple times to sort out the matter as it has been a year,” Ambekar added.

Fernandes also told LCW that his association has filed an RTI at the TMC to know the current status of the case and added that they would file a Contempt of Court petition against the TMC.

LCW called up the office of the TMC multiple times but nobody responded.

Nishikant Sawant, secretary of Ravi Estate CHS, told a news daily that in the past, the residents had also objected to a proposal to build a Hindu crematorium in the area. “There is a large well on the plot and the groundwater will be contaminated if there are bodies decomposing just a few feet away,” he said.   

In 2021, Melwyn Fernandes moved the High Court of Bombay with a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions against the TMC to open all properties that have been earmarked for Christian burial grounds in the Development Plan of Thane City.

In their order dated 19 July 2023, a division bench of Acting Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Arif S. Doctor directed that the plots earmarked for burial grounds in the Development Plan are not to be used for any other purpose, and directed the TMC to file an affidavit detailing the steps taken by TMC in this regard.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

The playground should not be turned into a burial ground

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Three housing societies - Ravi Estate CHS, Suresh Park and Cosmos Horizon, and Our Lady of Mercy Church

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Varsha Torgalkar

Varsha is an independent journalist based out of Pune. She covers travel, social justice, gender and climate change for national and international news publications. She has written extensively on the agrarian crisis in Marathwada and Vidarbha regions and is interested in rural journalism. She holds a diploma in journalism and a Master’s degree in Political Science from Pune University. Varsha is an avid trekker and has successfully scaled Everest Base Camp, Annapurna Circuit Trek and Goecha La.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us