Nagaland
Tsithrongse
,
Diezephe
,
Chumukedima
Published :
May 2024
|
Updated :
Tension flares up in Nagaland's Tsithrongse and Diezephe after villagers clash over land dispute
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2024
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2024
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Communal/Ethnic Conflict
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Communal/Ethnic Conflict
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Tension gripped the villages of Diezephe and Tsithrongse in Nagaland after residents of both the villages engaged in destruction of public and private properties and arson on 10 February 2024 over an old land dispute.

Situated within the administrative purview of Chümoukedima district, approximately 15 kilometres southwest of Dimapur, these two communities have long grappled with conflicting claims over specific territories. Despite being divided by the Public Works Department (PWD) road, contention arises over certain areas purportedly contested by both villages.

According to a report, people from Diezephe village alleged that individuals from Tsithrongse village arrived with arms and destroyed properties within Diezephe village boundaries amidst a contentious land dispute. The alleged vandalism included the demolition of resting sheds, cultivation areas, houses, etc. They also fired shots in the air. Following which, residents of Diezephe village reportedly retaliated and burnt down houses in Tsithrongse village.

A source from Police department stated, “There was no physical confrontation between the two parties but both the parties took to destroying the other’s property on lands claimed by both. The two villages are separated by the PWD road but there are disputed areas on one side. It is a long pending village border dispute. Only the revenue department will have an idea about the demarcation, if there are records.”

Following fresh tension, Commissioner of Police Dimapur, Kevithuto Sophie, imposed Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) within both the villages._ _This directive took effect at 6 pm on 10 February 2024 and it was revoked on 11 March 2024.  

Furthermore, the Commissioner of Police, Dimapur, also issued additional directives to the residents of both villages to deposit all licensed arms.

On 12 February 2024, Deputy Commissioner (DC) Chümoukedima, Abhinav Shivam, met the representatives from two villages, Tenyimia Union Dimapur (TUD) and Eastern Nagaland People’s Union Dimapur (ENPUD), and directed both the villages to maintain status quo. The DC further said that that the leaders of two villages would engage their communities and come together for future discussions with regard to the ongoing legal proceedings and the importance of peaceful conflict resolution._ _

The matter of reported gunfire during the incident has been referred to law enforcement authorities for investigation.

Earlier in 2015, residents of Tsithrongse village had approached Gauhati High Court regarding a boundary dispute with neighbouring Selouphe village council. However, the High Court noted that the case at hand involved a factual determination of the disputed land. The Court directed the deputy commissioner of the district to carry out an enquiry.

Meanwhile, a peace committee has been established to address the "35 years long dispute" between Diezephe and Tsithrongse villages. The committee was formed during a meeting of Tenyimi Union Dimapur (TUD) and Eastern Nagaland People’s Union Dimapur (ENPUD) on 28 February 2024. Five members each from the two villages are part of the committee.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Residential area, Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District administration of Chumoukedima, Police Department, Dimapur

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Diezephe Village Council, Tsithrongse Village Council

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Emilo R. Yanthan

Emilo is pursuing her PhD in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Her primary research areas include human and land rights and gender issues.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Residential area, Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us