Jharkhand
,
Chaitanpur Raziama, Redadah and Barsiadah
,
Seraikela Kharsawan
Published :
Mar 2019
|
Updated :
September 19, 2024
Suru irrigation project threatens to displace 4 villages in Jharkhand
Reported by
Connor Staggs
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
7000
People affected
1982
Year started
4000
Land area affected
Households affected
7000
People Affected
1982
Year started
4000
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of four villages in Jharkhand's Seraikela Kharsawan district face the risk of displacement from the Suru Medium Irrigation Project. Under the project, the Department of Water Resources plans to irrigate 4,000 hectares of farmland by building a reservoir on Suru River. While this would benefit farmers throughout the reservoir's newly irrigated area, the creation of the dam is likely to inundate the neighbouring villages of Chaitanpur, Raziama, Redadah and Barsiadah.

The project was conceived in 1982, but work did not begin until 2005. Moreover, the project affected families allege that the state did not secure the consent of the villagers, violating the Forest Rights Act, 2006. They led protests as the government failed to offer a resettlement and rehabilitation package at the time of land acquisition.

In March 2017, Sujeeta Tudu, a community correspondent for Video Volunteers, a human rights non-profit, documented how the project has affected her community. Protests have been held twice so far, during which at least seven persons have been subjected to tear gas.

Seraikela-Kharsawan Land Reform Deputy Collector Kunj Bihari Pandey told Tudu that he was not the concerned authority when the violations took place and that the villagers should submit an application to the appropriate official.

The local people have submitted several Right to Information applications to the district collector to halt the construction of the dam, but they are yet to receive a satisfactory response from the government. Sunalal Munda, one of the affected farmers, said, "We have not received any other land where we can move to."

Meanwhile, work on the dam continues in the absence of a clear resettlement and rehabilitation plan from the state. According to the Department of Economic Affairs, only about two per cent of the work was completed as of April 2016.

On 20 May 2019, the construction work was stopped after a Naxalite attack on the project site. By then, Rs 29 crore had been spent on this project and about 44% of the work was completed, while 56% work was left.

On 4 February 2022, the then MLA Dashrath Gagrai performed the Bhoomi Pujan along with Water Resources Department Engineer Manohar Prasad to resume the work.

During the Bhoomi Pujan, the local MLA had said that years ago, some of the displaced people had received compensation from the government under this scheme. But now the number of displaced family members has increased. Therefore, the government will conduct fresh survey and identify other displaced families and provide them benefits under the displacement policy.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to halt dam construction due to the threat of inundation

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

6

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

1982

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department, Water Resources Department, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Video Volunteers

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Connor Staggs
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us