Assam
,
Dibrugarh
,
Dibrugarh
Published :
Dec 2023
|
Updated :
Street vendors evicted in Assam's Dibrugarh for defying relocation order
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2023
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2023
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

The Dibrugarh Municipal Board (DMB) evicted street vendors who failed to relocate to approved vending zones and were encroaching on the footpaths in Dibrugarh town on August 7, 2023. A week later, a mob of around 200 alleged street vendors attacked the car of Dibrugarh MLA Prasanta Phukan and a ward commissioner, leading to the arrest of Dibrugarh Vendors Association‘s (DVA) leader, Madan Shah.

The civic body stated that they had given notice to the street vendors to relocate to the seven vending zones approved by the civic body on RKB Road, AT Road, Khalihamari Road, Graham Bazar-Paltan Bazar Road, and Paltan Bazar-AMCH Road. Furthermore, from the Dibrugarh Police Reserve point to the DTP culvert along Mancotta Road, a food lane known as "Khao Gali", had been set aside explicitly for street vendors.

By August 6, 2023, the last date for shifting, only 30% of the street vendors had moved to the approved area. Others were unwilling to shift saying that the vending zones were in "inconvenient locations", which would lead to a drop in the footfall of customers.

A day later, the DMB chairman, Saikat Patra, Vice President Ujjal Phukon, DMB executive officer Rashika Shyam, and ward commissioners spearheaded the eviction campaign against those who defied the order.

DMB chairman Saikat Patra told The Times of India, “We have already sent them notices asking them to relocate to the designated vending zones. They were given enough time to move. The eviction drive was carried out against those who did not comply with the order. Their carts and stalls have been seized. They will be able to retrieve it from the municipal office on the condition that they shift to the designated vending zones. Our priority is very clear. We want to clear the rampant encroachment on footpaths by the street vendors. It is a part of our initiative to make Dibrugarh a clean and beautiful town.”

On August 19, 2023, a mob of around 200 alleged street vendors attacked the car of Dibrugarh MLA Prasanta Phukan while he was leaving after attending a meeting of the DMB. After the MLA left the spot with assistance of the police, the mob physically assaulted Dibyajyoti Hazarika, the ward commissioner of the town's municipal ward number five, who suffered minor injuries. Additionally, they tried to attack DMB Vice-Chairman Ujjal Phukon and Chairman Saikat Patra, but the police thwarted their attempt.

Following the incident, the DMB chairman lodged an FIR against Madan Shah, the head of the Dibrugarh Vendors Association who reportedly led the mob, and others at the Dibrugarh police station. The Dibrugarh police arrested Madan Shah and booked a case under sections 143, 147, 341, 352, 353 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

Four months after the incident, DMB chairman Saikat Patra told The Sentinel  that the "vending zones" have not achieved the expected results. "We have created specific "vending zones" for streamlining the street vendors of the town but even after four months it has not achieved the expected results because some of the street vendors again moved to their earlier locations. Many times we have evicted them and seized their vehicles but again they moved to their earlier place. They do not set up their stalls at the vending zone," he said.

On the other hand, the street vendors who moved back to the earlier locations, stated that they moved back due to financial loses.

However, civic body authorities have reiterated their commitment to ensure street vendors stick to designated vending zones amid the challenges posed by the unregulated food stalls on the footpaths.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

1

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code

Sections 143, 147, 341, 352, 353, and 427

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Dibrugarh Municipal Board, Dibrugarh Police

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Dibrugarh Vendors Association

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

1

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code

Sections 143, 147, 341, 352, 353, and 427

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Emilo R. Yanthan

Emilo is pursuing her PhD in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Her primary research areas include human and land rights and gender issues.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us